And as mentionned a hundred times in this thread, state is well below Maemo, and progress well above.

Which means it IS going somewhere, even if you repeat in 50 different ways that it is less functional than maemo right now (which is true but clearly not the point). And this is basically the only thing you've ever done in this thread.

I am soooo not getting what you're after now.

Maybe it's time for a new notification: This message is ignored because abill_uk is on your clueless list.

Is simple really, to find out the latest on this Meego adaption for the N900 and who is doing what about it's future because if this community does take a dive then maybe there might be a slight dimm chance some dev's can push this adaption further before that happens.

The reason for my comments are to find out where we are at currently and future IF there is one for meego regarding the N900.

I personally think it is so slow going it will fizz out soon and what with the lack of support from this community even for the cssu it does not look good.

Bad "news" always has a sidekick to it and if enough people are really interested in meego then reading this thread might rustle up something, who knows.

Got nothing to lose here we can only move forward, right now for 8 months or so of work it is abismal in my estimation so something has gone wrong somewhere.

Any further comments anyone?????.

Are you going to carry this charade on or will you just STFU and allow people to have opinions????.

Your post is a direct attack and should be deleted along with this post.

Are you being realistic here or are you just dreaming?.

every time you reply to abill....

... errr well...

lets just say he is typing with 1 hand

funny how so many threads in this forum turn into off topic nonsense and trolling after the first few pages. In most cases there's nothing worth reading or commenting to after page 5.

This post is after page 5. Were you intentionally being ironic?

Then flex your project leader muscles and try to be a little creative: What milestones should have been reached in the time that has been spent developing? Don't forget to make your list of milestones as complete as possible and assign every milestone a time estimate.

Make clear comments about the size of the different teams, how they are funded and how much time has been spent by every team (which typically is possible to translate to man years, man months or some equally quantitative measure).

Since you have opinions about the development speed, I'm sure you can explain why you think it's "slow going". Especially so if you back it up with the milestones and time estimates.

After that, it's possible to talk about your estimates and the people in the project can add actual data about time taken for different milestones and why they, potentially, differ from your estimates.