Reply
Thread Tools
Posts: 4 | Thanked: 3 times | Joined on Oct 2017
#271
Originally Posted by lantern View Post
It's already there. check /dev/pn54x
Thanks for the reference but this is the Near Field Communication device (NFC).

And I would like to have kernel support for the Network File System (NFS).
 

The Following User Says Thank You to pullrequest For This Useful Post:
Posts: 248 | Thanked: 1,142 times | Joined on Dec 2014 @ Earth
#272
Originally Posted by m4r0v3r View Post
planning to do a rebuild in a couple of days, I notice some people want CONFIG_MODULES enabled, BTRFS and TRIM support. Think I'll bundle them in, anything else people fancy?
I think several people were interested in networking solution (so basically NFS and CIFS/SMB).

Another nice thing would be to make it using the latest possible kernel (e.g.: the 3.10.1xx-something-ish currently used by Sony for their official Android 7.1.1 Nougat build, instead of the 3.10.84 that Sony previously used for their Android 6.0.1 Marshmallow and that Jolla used for their official SFOX image) :
it seems that there has been some bugfixes between these two versions that blocked some users to have their muSDXC card detected.

It would be nice if the kernel image works with the official Sailfish X
(it should, I don't see any reason why it shouldn't - as long as /oem is populated with the corresponding proprietary firmwares and drivers.).
 

The Following User Says Thank You to DrYak For This Useful Post:
Posts: 367 | Thanked: 1,442 times | Joined on Feb 2015
#273
Originally Posted by pullrequest View Post
Thanks for the reference but this is the Near Field Communication device (NFC).

And I would like to have kernel support for the Network File System (NFS).
While waiting fo kernel update, check this out, might help
https://github.com/facebookincubator/nfusr
https://github.com/NetDirect/nfsshell
 

The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to lantern For This Useful Post:
Posts: 1,746 | Thanked: 1,832 times | Joined on Dec 2010
#274
What about okboard?
 

The Following User Says Thank You to m4r0v3r For This Useful Post:
Posts: 292 | Thanked: 294 times | Joined on Jan 2012 @ Milan, Italy
#275
Originally Posted by m4r0v3r View Post
What about okboard?
On my (official) SFOS X it works, but the Italian dictionary is not updated for the latest version so I can only use it in English.
 

The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Watchmaker For This Useful Post:
Posts: 102 | Thanked: 187 times | Joined on Jan 2010
#276
Originally Posted by rinigus View Post
@mikecomputing, would be great to have active and contributing members in the community. I don't think we are in position where we should just sit and wait for SFOS to get better
...

No idea whether its allowed, but its a fair question. Its just insane that we have to use proprietary bits for text prediction. When (if) I get off the navigation software development, I would be happy to help anyone to get this piece of SFOS replaced with some open-sourced solution. Just would prefer to finish what I started before first. Any takers for developing text prediction for SFOS so we can drop XT9?
I think you hit a few nails here. I am willing on the same terms as you are. So for me the OKBoard is a nice piece of software and a good foundation for same or next word predictions with the swiping as icing on top of the cake. I helped promoting OKBoard by providing the Swedish language models very early on and helped others build resources for their favourite languages. OKBoard ties in nicely with the current maliit keyboard infra. As a language technologist I already back in the 90s did text prediction. Most lessons learned are that we should avoid special solutions but build something that tie in or adds to existing open solutions. In the case with xt9 we know the infra is not too restricted, so we could replace it fully with good enough API's for our free solution.
 

The Following 6 Users Say Thank You to ljo For This Useful Post:
Posts: 1,746 | Thanked: 1,832 times | Joined on Dec 2010
#277
enabling modules causes this error

net/built-in.o: In function `qtaguid_mt':
ipc_router_security.c.text+0x692ac): undefined reference to `xt_socket_put_sk'
ipc_router_security.c.text+0x69350): undefined reference to `xt_socket_get6_sk'
ipc_router_security.c.text+0x69360): undefined reference to `xt_socket_get4_sk'
ipc_router_security.c.text+0x693bc): undefined reference to `xt_socket_put_sk'
net/built-in.o: In function `tcp_nuke_addr':
ipc_router_security.c.text+0x7fdd8): undefined reference to `in6addr_any'
ipc_router_security.c.text+0x7fde8): undefined reference to `in6addr_any'
ipc_router_security.c.text+0x7ff40): undefined reference to `rt6_lookup'
make[2]: *** [vmlinux] Error 1
make[1]: *** [sub-make] Error 2
make[1]: Leaving directory `/home/martin/hadk/kernel/sony/msm'
make: *** [TARGET_KERNEL_BINARIES] Error 2
edit, fixed by disabling IPV6 since thats causing problems. But the F2FS module is causing issues.

Last edited by m4r0v3r; 2017-10-29 at 00:24.
 

The Following User Says Thank You to m4r0v3r For This Useful Post:
Posts: 248 | Thanked: 1,142 times | Joined on Dec 2014 @ Earth
#278
Originally Posted by m4r0v3r View Post
enabling modules causes this error
make[1]: Leaving directory `/home/martin/hadk/kernel/sony/msm'
Looks like sony's msm platform-specific stuff was never tested against modules.

Are these dependencies built-in as in the original kernel ?
Or are they switched to modules, now that modules are activated ?
 

The Following User Says Thank You to DrYak For This Useful Post:
Posts: 1,746 | Thanked: 1,832 times | Joined on Dec 2010
#279
Originally Posted by DrYak View Post
Looks like sony's msm platform-specific stuff was never tested against modules.

Are these dependencies built-in as in the original kernel ?
Or are they switched to modules, now that modules are activated ?
maybe? who knows, will have to give it a better look later, but now config_modules is enabled and it builds. just no modules with it :P
 

The Following User Says Thank You to m4r0v3r For This Useful Post:
Posts: 133 | Thanked: 387 times | Joined on Jul 2011
#280
A small and perhaps stupid question: is the community port identical to Jolla port minus exchange, predictive text input and alien dalvik?
 

The Following User Says Thank You to pexi For This Useful Post:
Reply

Thread Tools

 
Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 08:06.