Reply
Thread Tools
Posts: 214 | Thanked: 30 times | Joined on Jan 2008
#21
It doesn't work that way.

As an example last year Canon announced a 15mp point and shoot. People found that the old 10mp version had the same sharpness, except the files were a lot smaller, it was faster, etc. So last week Canon announced a new version, but this time they went back to 10mp.

The extra megapixels don't actually add more sharpness, they just add more pixels to blurry pictures. If you have a sensor designed from the beginning with larger pixels then you can increase the sensitivity, which gives you sharper pictures. You can increase the sensitivity on a high megapixel camera as well, but because the individual pixels are so small, you will get noise. The camera will try to correct for noise by blurring the picture, so now you are back to where you started.
 
ysss's Avatar
Posts: 4,384 | Thanked: 5,524 times | Joined on Jul 2007 @ ˙ǝɹǝɥʍou
#22
@drizek: that's a very sharp picture. was it taken with said Nikon D40?
but comparing a compact (minicule sensor and lens size) with a DSLR wouldn't be fair though...
 
Posts: 3,319 | Thanked: 5,610 times | Joined on Aug 2008 @ Finland
#23
Originally Posted by drizek View Post
The more megapixels a camera has, the crappier the individual pixels become.

One of the best SLRs for low light photography is the Nikon D40,because it has only 6mp. Compare the size of the D40 to the size of the n900 to see what a 5 or 6mp camera needs to look like to actually take decent photos.
I know what you're trying to say, but you're saying it in a misleading way. You just said that a D40 with 6 megapixels is better than a D3 that sports 12. Well it isn't. There are numerous parameters taken into account, like CCD size, the readout noise of individual pixels, etc.

The other thing you're somethat wrong about is color reproduction and sharpness. The higher resolution camera means the bayer RGB array is spread out through more pixels, so the 5Mpix cam *CAN* make FAR better (sharper and better colors) 1.3Mpix photo than a 1.3Mpix camera if it's implemented correctly. If it's crap, it's crap, but it's not the pixel COUNT that makes it crap (it's just a part of the equation).
 

The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to attila77 For This Useful Post:
allnameswereout's Avatar
Posts: 3,397 | Thanked: 1,212 times | Joined on Jul 2008 @ Netherlands
#24
Originally Posted by jaysin22 View Post
On Flickr at http://www.flickr.com/photos/mardytardi/3862538080/ there is a picture of a N900 party and the properties tag looks a little strange.
No EXIF metadata found.
__________________
Goosfraba! All text written by allnameswereout is public domain unless stated otherwise. Thank you for sharing your output!
 
sachin007's Avatar
Posts: 2,041 | Thanked: 1,066 times | Joined on Mar 2006 @ Houston
#25
Picture from n900

http://web1.twitpic.com/img/26193470...8273a-full.jpg
Attached Images
 
 

The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to sachin007 For This Useful Post:
Posts: 356 | Thanked: 231 times | Joined on Oct 2007
#26
This one
http://www.flickr.com/photos/asimula...86898/sizes/o/
isn't bad. I would say it is on par with N97 examples I saw.
 
krisse's Avatar
Posts: 1,540 | Thanked: 1,045 times | Joined on Feb 2007
#27
I really wouldn't rely on sample photos from prototypes, we've seen quite a lot of prototype S60 models on All About Symbian where the photo compression algorithms changed completely between the prototype and production models.
 

The Following User Says Thank You to krisse For This Useful Post:
Posts: 1,038 | Thanked: 737 times | Joined on Nov 2005 @ Helsinki
#28
Looks quality wise from old proto imho.
 

The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to konttori For This Useful Post:
pelago's Avatar
Posts: 2,121 | Thanked: 1,540 times | Joined on Mar 2008 @ Oxford, UK
#29
Originally Posted by sachin007 View Post
Picture from n900

http://web1.twitpic.com/img/26193470...8273a-full.jpg
Have you got a link to the twitpic page which links to that image, as it looks like direct linking isn't working and I was looking for a higher-res version than your attachment.
Originally Posted by vvaz View Post
This one
http://www.flickr.com/photos/asimula...86898/sizes/o/
isn't bad. I would say it is on par with N97 examples I saw.
"The photo you were looking for has been deleted."
 
Posts: 49 | Thanked: 7 times | Joined on Apr 2007
#30
Anyone else notice that since we have been referring to aSIULAtor's Flick Photo's all the ones we were thinking were from a N900 have been removed. I wonder is that was because we stirred something up and they shouldn't have been posted. Maybe those were real picks.
 
Reply


 
Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 10:35.