Reply
Thread Tools
Capt'n Corrupt's Avatar
Posts: 3,524 | Thanked: 2,958 times | Joined on Oct 2007 @ Delta Quadrant
#21
I will be watching this device with great interest...


}:^)~
YARR!

WEEEEE!
 
Posts: 12 | Thanked: 1 time | Joined on Apr 2008
#22
There appears to be a video titled "OpenMoko UI Train wreck"
 
Posts: 333 | Thanked: 32 times | Joined on Jul 2007
#23
The wireless card is a Atheros chipset but does not support monitor mode....
 
benny1967's Avatar
Posts: 3,790 | Thanked: 5,718 times | Joined on Mar 2006 @ Vienna, Austria
#24
Originally Posted by randomhack View Post
There appears to be a video titled "OpenMoko UI Train wreck"
OMG! How low can this sect go? Do they really need a half-baked device made for a niche market of free software enthusiasts and developers to show off that their jesusPhone has a bigger one?

EDIT:
keyboard. bigger keyboard.

Last edited by benny1967; 2008-07-23 at 10:53. Reason: add keyboard to be more precise
 
tso's Avatar
Posts: 4,783 | Thanked: 1,253 times | Joined on Aug 2007 @ norway
#25
i was not aware that the freerunner shipped with 2007.2 and not ASU as the default firmware...
 
frethop's Avatar
Posts: 283 | Thanked: 60 times | Joined on Nov 2005 @ It's dark in here. I hear laughing.
#26
I think this is a device with a lot of promise, but a loooong way to go. I have one right now, but unfortunately I also have a Nokia N95 8GB.

I dig the open-source-ness of this thing, but this seems to cripple the device as well. App development is slow. Heck, the UI framework development is even slow (and changing). For example, the only way to configure the device is to (a) set up USB networking and (b) use the commandline and gconftool. There is no configuration/settings app. The only way it comes close to my N95 is that I can use it as a phone.

I know that this is a young platform and that an open source phone is very cool, but for Openmoko to survive against the phone biggies, it's gotta develop fast and have an interface that at least comes close to popular phones. It does not feel like open source is going to make that happen.

Last edited by frethop; 2008-07-23 at 11:49.
 
tso's Avatar
Posts: 4,783 | Thanked: 1,253 times | Joined on Aug 2007 @ norway
#27
the big diff is that what we see in the open with the openmoko is what goes on hidden in the phone corps.

hell, most phone corps keep slapping on the same old os with minor tweaks on new products. a os that have been around for years and years.
 
frethop's Avatar
Posts: 283 | Thanked: 60 times | Joined on Nov 2005 @ It's dark in here. I hear laughing.
#28
Originally Posted by tso View Post
the big diff is that what we see in the open with the openmoko is what goes on hidden in the phone corps.
I agree. However, concepts -- like openness and freedom and liberty -- don't sell phones or devices. Implementations do. I worry a lot that, while open source is a great thing, it's going die unless commercial companies work like Nokia has -- to lead with semi-open software and let developers work the rest.
 
tso's Avatar
Posts: 4,783 | Thanked: 1,253 times | Joined on Aug 2007 @ norway
#29
it seems to sell good enough, for now.

problem is that the press made it out to be a ready phone for the masses, while openmoko planned it as a upgraded neo for developers and enthusiasts. or at least thats the impression im getting these days.

basically, its a similar product to what bug labs are selling.
 
Posts: 7 | Thanked: 0 times | Joined on Dec 2007
#30
Originally Posted by tso View Post
problem is that the press made it out to be a ready phone for the masses, while openmoko planned it as a upgraded neo for developers and enthusiasts. or at least thats the impression im getting these days.
The press weren't the only people that made it out to be ready for mass market. I believe the openmoko's roadmap slated a consumer ready device to be ready by the Spring of this year...
 
Reply


 
Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 10:58.