Active Topics
-
Is there a section to talk about Java ME? Apps, etc. (3)
to General by Kalatti - 1 day, 16 hrs ago - more...
 |
|
2010-07-15
, 21:33
|
|
Posts: 11,700 |
Thanked: 10,045 times |
Joined on Jun 2006
@ North Texas, USA
|
#12
|
Originally Posted by gerbick
I will take zero communication over spin, lies, etc. Every time.
Those are all indeed all wrong. But which would you rather have? No communication or communication that says "It's in the fine print. That's how it is, tough." or that BS that Apple has been spreading?
Regardless... I have my own feelings. And non-communication is higher on my list of no-no's than bad communication (sometimes) but at this moment, Nokia and Apple are neck and neck for companies I will not purchase until they both do better.
And I own stock for both. Imagine that.
And deleted forum posts are chilling ANTIcommunication.
__________________
Nokia Developer Champion
Different <> Wrong | Listen - Judgment = Progress | People + Trust = Success
My personal site: http://texrat.net
Nokia Developer Champion
Different <> Wrong | Listen - Judgment = Progress | People + Trust = Success
My personal site: http://texrat.net
|
|
2010-07-15
, 21:33
|
|
Posts: 3,428 |
Thanked: 2,856 times |
Joined on Jul 2008
|
#13
|
Originally Posted by ysss
That.. actually.. would be an argument for companies not wanting to say anything
What's good about apple (or Jobs) responding (in anyway) to this issue is that he can be held accountable for what he says in the future.
Compare that with a company that keeps absolute silence...
.
|
|
2010-07-15
, 21:38
|
|
Posts: 3,428 |
Thanked: 2,856 times |
Joined on Jul 2008
|
#14
|
Originally Posted by Texrat
I'm a little confused... how is either solution beneficial in any way.. at all?
I will take zero communication over spin, lies, etc. Every time.
|
|
2010-07-15
, 21:58
|
|
Posts: 1,213 |
Thanked: 356 times |
Joined on Jan 2008
@ California and Virginia
|
#15
|
Originally Posted by Zibeb
You realize that the N900 has an eFuse chip also right? Any phone with an OMAP3 has an eFuse chip, just no one activates them. The original Droid has it also, and it was never activated. No reason to think Moto would do it now...
After reading this, and reading the story about the Droid X tripping a fuse and bricking itself if it's modded; it really cements the fact that truely open source operating systems may become a safe haven for smartphone owners. Meego and Symbian might get some converts that way, who knows?
__________________
----------------------------------------------------
www.ezschool.com - The best online educational experience.
----------------------------------------------------
www.ezschool.com - The best online educational experience.
|
|
2010-07-15
, 22:11
|
|
Posts: 3,401 |
Thanked: 1,255 times |
Joined on Nov 2005
@ London, UK
|
#16
|
Originally Posted by Thesandlord
OMAP3 uses e-fuse technology in the M-Shield security hardware, most likely to allow reprogramming of the public keys that are stored in the chip - a wise choice considering private keys can become compromised which would render the entire line of OMAP3 SoCs insecure.
Any phone with an OMAP3 has an eFuse chip, just no one activates them.
I don't think the e-fuse technology is capable of crippling the OMAP3 hardware intentionally, however - seems like another hoax to me.
|
|
2010-07-15
, 22:12
|
|
Guest |
Posts: n/a |
Thanked: 0 times |
Joined on
|
#17
|
Originally Posted by Texrat
I'll take neither, thank you very much.
I will take zero communication over spin, lies, etc. Every time.
|
|
2010-07-15
, 23:12
|
|
Posts: 11,700 |
Thanked: 10,045 times |
Joined on Jun 2006
@ North Texas, USA
|
#18
|
Originally Posted by fatalsaint
I'm confused-- who said either was?
I'm a little confused... how is either solution beneficial in any way.. at all?
The point was given a choice, which evil I'd rather settle for. Thought that was clear from the conversation...
__________________
Nokia Developer Champion
Different <> Wrong | Listen - Judgment = Progress | People + Trust = Success
My personal site: http://texrat.net
Nokia Developer Champion
Different <> Wrong | Listen - Judgment = Progress | People + Trust = Success
My personal site: http://texrat.net
|
|
2010-07-16
, 12:21
|
|
Posts: 130 |
Thanked: 48 times |
Joined on Jan 2010
@ Hampshire, UK
|
#19
|
Analysts have estimated a recall could cost up to $1.5bn (£1bn) whereas the cost of issuing free rubber bumpers to alleviate the problem would be cheaper. Estimates based on the retail costs of bumpers suggest giving out the protectors would cost nearly $180m (£118m).
I highly doubt they will recall the product as they are still struggling to keep up with demand.
I highly doubt they will recall the product as they are still struggling to keep up with demand.
 |
|
2010-07-16
, 13:48
|
|
Posts: 2,427 |
Thanked: 2,986 times |
Joined on Dec 2007
|
#20
|
Originally Posted by DJRedline
I'll go out on a limb and say these numbers are a misrepresentation. Lost revenue is not equal to cost. And lost revenue that you would never have had in the first place, is dust in the wind [see RIAA and Kansas]. So, if the rumored mark-up on the bumpers of $29 is accurate, the most the free bumber response would cost Apple, as of the time of this article, would be:
Analysts have estimated a recall could cost up to $1.5bn (£1bn) whereas the cost of issuing free rubber bumpers to alleviate the problem would be cheaper. Estimates based on the retail costs of bumpers suggest giving out the protectors would cost nearly $180m (£118m).
$180,000,000 / $30 = $6,000,000 USD
Shipping not included.
__________________
N9: Go white or go home
N9: Go white or go home
 |
| Tags |
| let's turn off, the dim light |
«
Previous Thread
|
Next Thread
»
|
All times are GMT. The time now is 17:53.
Compare that with a company that keeps absolute silence...
Class .. : Power User
Humor .. : [#####-----] | Alignment: Pragmatist
Patience : [###-------] | Weapon(s): Galaxy Note + BB Bold Touch 9900
Agro ... : [###-------] | Relic(s) : iPhone 4S, Atrix, Milestone, N900, N800, N95, HTC G1, Treos, Zauri, BB 9000, BB 9700, etc