Active Topics
-
Is there a section to talk about Java ME? Apps, etc. (7)
to General by teroyk - 16 hrs, 7 mins ago - more...
 |
|
2015-04-30
, 09:52
|
|
Posts: 2,222 |
Thanked: 12,651 times |
Joined on Mar 2010
@ SOL 3
|
#292
|
Originally Posted by chemist
thanks for this, it shows exactly the whole mess in all this. I have read the bylaws, that's why I didn't believe that the MCeV bylaws were compatible with council's, and I clearly stated that - nevertheless I have been belied at that they WERE COMPATIBLE and any possible problems COULD GET FIXED BY ADJUSTING MCeV BYLAWS LATER ON. I didn't contribute to the bylaws since I'm not obliged to and had no spare time to do so, and I clearly stated that but nevertheless always pointed at this problem.
So we are at it again. Bylaws have been made up without you being able to read them - in the shadows. As you are able to write I guess you are able to read too. It really breaks down to an actual minor detail, minor as at some point MCeV might even be bigger as the usual amount of votes as it is 1/4 already. If anybody wanted to overpower or exclude council somebody could have moved fwd in that direction at some point but didn't. So if this is really just about you being lied to. Move on already, you are not the only one being lied to! Words have been said, trust has been destroyed... Have fun, I'm out.
Now you lie to me and others again, stating that council had already accepted the MCeV bylaws and thus change in own voting or whatever, everybody who wants to know the truth is welcome to e.g. read the protocol of that inaugural meeting of MCeV.
Foundation of a german e.V. been originally my suggestion since I was (and still am) convinced that german laws allow more liberties in formulating statutes that american laws did for the HiFo. Nevertheless I always pointed at the importance to take special care to incorporate the Maemo Council same way it actually was possible to integrate it into HiFo bylaws and proceedings.
Now the story you tell is we need that german e.V. since the HiFo can't accomplish what's needed, and yet obviously the way you set up the e.V is resulting in an inferior entity than HiFo regarding compatibility with maemo community. And when you're getting called out on it, you resort to ad hominem and bitching and lies.
I'm done with this, do whatever you want. Just stop spreading lies about my behavior and/or my statements and votes!
BR
jOERG
__________________
Maemo Community Council member [2012-10, 2013-05, 2013-11, 2014-06 terms]
Hildon Foundation Council inaugural member.
MCe.V. foundation member
EX Hildon Foundation approved Maemo Administration Coordinator (stepped down due to bullying 2014-04-05)
aka "techstaff" - the guys who keep your infra running - Devotion to Duty http://xkcd.com/705/
IRC(freenode): DocScrutinizer*
First USB hostmode fanatic, father of H-E-N
Maemo Community Council member [2012-10, 2013-05, 2013-11, 2014-06 terms]
Hildon Foundation Council inaugural member.
MCe.V. foundation member
EX Hildon Foundation approved Maemo Administration Coordinator (stepped down due to bullying 2014-04-05)
aka "techstaff" - the guys who keep your infra running - Devotion to Duty http://xkcd.com/705/
IRC(freenode): DocScrutinizer*
First USB hostmode fanatic, father of H-E-N
| The Following User Says Thank You to joerg_rw For This Useful Post: | ||
|
|
2015-04-30
, 10:35
|
|
Posts: 1,290 |
Thanked: 4,319 times |
Joined on Oct 2014
|
#293
|
I will do anything except bear the responsibility of guarding a house that has two doors.
Time for MCeV to get moving - if HiFo allows, that is....
__________________
You can still support my work by donation - click here
You can still support my work by donation - click here
 |
|
2015-04-30
, 12:15
|
|
Administrator |
Posts: 1,036 |
Thanked: 2,019 times |
Joined on Sep 2009
@ Germany
|
#294
|
To end this
is your exact wording from the founding meeting http://mg.pov.lt/maemo-meeting-irclo...03-18.log.html
This discussion is about said referendum. It had no impact on council and we said we could not have that - by doing that MCeV would separate councils into two again - and that is what we neither need nor like to happen.
Minutes of the meeting http://talk.maemo.org/showthread.php?t=92922 being signed without further note of that being said but it was and still is recognized. We heard you the first time 2nd rd 4th 5th ...Nth time also - so you call me out for lying about something we actually have public record for, public record as in IRC logs, published minutes and signed documents filed at court. Next time you try to pick on me take a topic there is no log of, like last time - don't even dare to reply to that with something else than a sane suggestion for a referendum phrasing!
Can we, please, move fwd in phrasing the referendum to get council out of limbo (again).
I agree, though I note that those have no impact on council rules and can't have until council would start a referendum to change said rules. Aside from this concern all fine with me
This discussion is about said referendum. It had no impact on council and we said we could not have that - by doing that MCeV would separate councils into two again - and that is what we neither need nor like to happen.
Minutes of the meeting http://talk.maemo.org/showthread.php?t=92922 being signed without further note of that being said but it was and still is recognized. We heard you the first time 2nd rd 4th 5th ...Nth time also - so you call me out for lying about something we actually have public record for, public record as in IRC logs, published minutes and signed documents filed at court. Next time you try to pick on me take a topic there is no log of, like last time - don't even dare to reply to that with something else than a sane suggestion for a referendum phrasing!
Can we, please, move fwd in phrasing the referendum to get council out of limbo (again).
__________________
useful links for newcomers: New members say hello, New users start here, Community subforum, Beginners' wiki page, Maemo5 101, FAQ
useful links for newcomers: New members say hello, New users start here, Community subforum, Beginners' wiki page, Maemo5 101, FAQ
|
|
2015-04-30
, 12:20
|
|
Posts: 1,290 |
Thanked: 4,319 times |
Joined on Oct 2014
|
#295
|
Originally Posted by chemist
Thank You !
Can we, please, move fwd in phrasing the referendum to get council out of limbo (again).
10 chars
__________________
You can still support my work by donation - click here
You can still support my work by donation - click here
|
|
2015-04-30
, 15:13
|
|
Posts: 2,222 |
Thanked: 12,651 times |
Joined on Mar 2010
@ SOL 3
|
#296
|
thanks for finally confirming - when not in intended meaning so nevertheless in actual quotes and statements. The rest... :-x
__________________
Maemo Community Council member [2012-10, 2013-05, 2013-11, 2014-06 terms]
Hildon Foundation Council inaugural member.
MCe.V. foundation member
EX Hildon Foundation approved Maemo Administration Coordinator (stepped down due to bullying 2014-04-05)
aka "techstaff" - the guys who keep your infra running - Devotion to Duty http://xkcd.com/705/
IRC(freenode): DocScrutinizer*
First USB hostmode fanatic, father of H-E-N
Maemo Community Council member [2012-10, 2013-05, 2013-11, 2014-06 terms]
Hildon Foundation Council inaugural member.
MCe.V. foundation member
EX Hildon Foundation approved Maemo Administration Coordinator (stepped down due to bullying 2014-04-05)
aka "techstaff" - the guys who keep your infra running - Devotion to Duty http://xkcd.com/705/
IRC(freenode): DocScrutinizer*
First USB hostmode fanatic, father of H-E-N
|
|
2015-04-30
, 22:49
|
|
Administrator |
Posts: 1,036 |
Thanked: 2,019 times |
Joined on Sep 2009
@ Germany
|
#297
|
Referendum suggestion:
Please vote Yes if you agree with the following changes to the Maemo Community Council election rules:
change § 4.1 Council Elections Subsection 6 from
to
and § 4.1 Council Elections Subsection 12
to
As there is a typo (a missing sentence @12) in the original bylaws I just rewrote the whole thing. - bring on your suggestions please. To reduce actual confusion and misunderstanding we might just leave out the original text or we'd need to quote both - we should probably move or link the old election rules page to the bylaws for future reference.
Please vote Yes if you agree with the following changes to the Maemo Community Council election rules:
change § 4.1 Council Elections Subsection 6 from
Nominees with a professional interest in Maemo, such as working for Nokia - or any other company involved in Maemo-related software development - must declare their interest when advertising their nomination. Failure to do so may result in the Nokia Community Manager, or the outgoing Council, declaring their nomination invalid and so bar them from standing in the current election.
Nominees with a professional interest in Maemo, such as working for a company involved in Maemo-related software development - must declare their interest when advertising their nomination. Failure to do so may result in the Board of Directors, or the outgoing Council, declaring their nomination invalid and so bar them from standing in the current election.
Voting in such referenda will be open to anyone eligible to vote in the council elections.
a) The referendum options must be debated for a minimum of 1 month prior to the referendum.
b) Referendum voting will be open for the same length of time as the council elections.
Changes to any of the above rules must be approved by a resolution of the Passive Members' Meeting or General Assembly.
a) Voting in such, will be open to anyone eligible to vote in the respective meeting.
b) The changes must be debated for a minimum of 1 month prior to the resolution.
c) Passive Members' Meeting resolution voting will be open for the same length of time as the council elections.
__________________
useful links for newcomers: New members say hello, New users start here, Community subforum, Beginners' wiki page, Maemo5 101, FAQ
useful links for newcomers: New members say hello, New users start here, Community subforum, Beginners' wiki page, Maemo5 101, FAQ
| The Following 6 Users Say Thank You to chemist For This Useful Post: | ||
 |
|
2015-04-30
, 23:20
|
|
Posts: 52 |
Thanked: 196 times |
Joined on Jul 2010
|
#298
|
1) proposed change to § 4.1 Council Elections Subsection 6 : when nominating self for council must declare interest ...
- such as working for Nokia
+ such as working for a company involved in Maemo-related software development (option 1, your)
+ such as working for a company involved in Maemo-related software or hardware development (option 2, mine)
no problem with this change, i don't see why it needs a referendum, most people would simply agree
2) proposed change to § 4.1 Council Elections Subsection 12 : Changes to any of the above rules must be approved by...
- a referendum by everyone registered on garage (= all passive members)
+ general assembly meeting or passive members meeting (your option)
agreed with your option i think, because these rules are legally binding and any changes should be by people with an identity
this is a little worth a referendum because it's a politically significant change of peoples' rights
what? i found this, it is a document for council, it's not legally binding for eV - i do not see a reason to change this item
3) the rest of this discussion is odd, as mentioned before i wouldn't require all council members to join mcev while leaving its roles as is (including being elected by all registered eligible garage users) as if what it asks is illegal then the board can refuse to fullfill its requests anyway
so i am glad you posted your referendum version, it sets aside a lot of noise
Last edited by gryllida; 2015-05-01 at 02:11.
- such as working for Nokia
+ such as working for a company involved in Maemo-related software development (option 1, your)
+ such as working for a company involved in Maemo-related software or hardware development (option 2, mine)
no problem with this change, i don't see why it needs a referendum, most people would simply agree
2) proposed change to § 4.1 Council Elections Subsection 12 : Changes to any of the above rules must be approved by...
- a referendum by everyone registered on garage (= all passive members)
+ general assembly meeting or passive members meeting (your option)
this is a little worth a referendum because it's a politically significant change of peoples' rights
what? i found this, it is a document for council, it's not legally binding for eV - i do not see a reason to change this item
3) the rest of this discussion is odd, as mentioned before i wouldn't require all council members to join mcev while leaving its roles as is (including being elected by all registered eligible garage users) as if what it asks is illegal then the board can refuse to fullfill its requests anyway
so i am glad you posted your referendum version, it sets aside a lot of noise
Last edited by gryllida; 2015-05-01 at 02:11.
| The Following 5 Users Say Thank You to gryllida For This Useful Post: | ||
 |
|
2015-05-01
, 14:44
|
|
Community Council |
Posts: 664 |
Thanked: 1,648 times |
Joined on Apr 2012
@ Hamburg
|
#299
|
I am missing the part about an undoubtful votum that there'll be only one unified Council after all which resides within MC e.V. and not in outlaw land. I believe this needs clarification since some people here claim that Council is just an aggregation of interests which shall never be servant to any kind of assiciation, but it's leader. 7 months and 30 pages later, this is considered "noise" (unless I misunderstood that part). Not exactly fast, but it shows there's hope...
Still, I'd prefer to be on the safe side and have some kind of avowal for MC e.V. in the referendum.
In MC e.V., the Bylaws (which are supperior to General Regulations) grant sovereignity over General Regulations to GA and Council election rules (§ 4.1) are part of that. This fact seems to be part of the critique for those claiming "compatibilty" issues. In order to make a referendum the *only* option to amand them, Council election rules would need to be seperated from General Regulations (just like there are Board Regulations). I have no objections to this, the only thing is, this can't be subject to a referendum, it requires a descission by GA, so persuade them and this may be resolved too. Why shouldn't community determine it's election procedure for its' representavive on it's own? You have my voice for that.
Still, I'd prefer to be on the safe side and have some kind of avowal for MC e.V. in the referendum.
In MC e.V., the Bylaws (which are supperior to General Regulations) grant sovereignity over General Regulations to GA and Council election rules (§ 4.1) are part of that. This fact seems to be part of the critique for those claiming "compatibilty" issues. In order to make a referendum the *only* option to amand them, Council election rules would need to be seperated from General Regulations (just like there are Board Regulations). I have no objections to this, the only thing is, this can't be subject to a referendum, it requires a descission by GA, so persuade them and this may be resolved too. Why shouldn't community determine it's election procedure for its' representavive on it's own? You have my voice for that.
__________________
Nokia 5110 > 3310 > 6230 > N70 > N9 BLACK 64GB
Hildon Foundation Board member
Maemo Community e.V. co-creator, founder and director since Q4/2016
Current Maemo Community Council member
Nokia 5110 > 3310 > 6230 > N70 > N9 BLACK 64GB
Hildon Foundation Board member
Maemo Community e.V. co-creator, founder and director since Q4/2016
Current Maemo Community Council member
| The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Win7Mac For This Useful Post: | ||
|
|
2015-05-01
, 15:33
|
|
Administrator |
Posts: 1,036 |
Thanked: 2,019 times |
Joined on Sep 2009
@ Germany
|
#300
|
Originally Posted by gryllida
how about: such as working for a company commercially interested in Maemo
1) proposed change to § 4.1 Council Elections Subsection 6 : when nominating self for council must declare interest ...
- such as working for Nokia
+ such as working for a company involved in Maemo-related software development (option 1, your)
+ such as working for a company involved in Maemo-related software or hardware development (option 2, mine)
Originally Posted by gryllida
Because it is written rule (Council Election Rules) to have a referendum (I do not like that word) to change said rules.
no problem with this change, i don't see why it needs a referendum, most people would simply agree
Originally Posted by gryllida
Everyone registered on garage (= all passive members) equals (as in is the very same as) Passive Members' Meeting (legal term)
2) proposed change to § 4.1 Council Elections Subsection 12 : Changes to any of the above rules must be approved by...
- a referendum by everyone registered on garage (= all passive members)
+ general assembly meeting or passive members meeting (your option)
Originally Posted by gryllida
That was discussed and not desired as no-one should be forced to join the MCeV to become council.
3) the rest of this discussion is odd, as mentioned before i wouldn't require all council members to join mcev while leaving its roles as is (including being elected by all registered eligible garage users) as if what it asks is illegal then the board can refuse to fullfill its requests anyway
I have no objections to this, the only thing is, this can't be subject to a referendum, it requires a descission by GA, so persuade them and this may be resolved too. Why shouldn't community determine it's election procedure for its' representavive on it's own? You have my voice for that.
I honestly do not get where the deal is with people "demanding" council be the very same as with Nokia and be THE untouchable whatever they think it is. Truth is, the community, us, we, been represented by this council but now the community, we, us, owns Maemo - so the reason to have a council is to leave the option to participate by representation instead of joining the association directly, so people can stay anonymous, trigger discussion with council which draws attention to their needs. Future talk: Council would then pick the right people from MCeV to move on the issue. As far as I am concerned anonymous should not be able to alter any rules not even council election rules, if they want them changed they can ask council about it and move up the ladder...
I'd maybe just give up on getting this sorted any time soon...
__________________
useful links for newcomers: New members say hello, New users start here, Community subforum, Beginners' wiki page, Maemo5 101, FAQ
useful links for newcomers: New members say hello, New users start here, Community subforum, Beginners' wiki page, Maemo5 101, FAQ
| The Following 7 Users Say Thank You to chemist For This Useful Post: | ||
 |
| Tags |
| discussion, legal body |
«
Previous Thread
|
Next Thread
»
|
All times are GMT. The time now is 04:34.
Enforced by threats of punishment, and promises of reward.
Makes everyday interactions predictable and acceptable.
Roles define proper behavior for certain positions we hold.
Roles are regulated by rules.
How many was broken so far ?
You can still support my work by donation - click here