BentL
|
2016-02-04
, 18:29
|
Posts: 39 |
Thanked: 117 times |
Joined on Apr 2010
@ Norway
|
#11
|
The Following User Says Thank You to BentL For This Useful Post: | ||
|
2016-02-05
, 04:16
|
Posts: 109 |
Thanked: 84 times |
Joined on Sep 2014
@ India
|
#12
|
The Following User Says Thank You to tioubxancur For This Useful Post: | ||
|
2016-02-05
, 16:54
|
Posts: 146 |
Thanked: 99 times |
Joined on Jan 2012
@ Lisbon, Portugal
|
#13
|
I've been wondering myself if I've just got too much stored in the tracker sparql database. I seem to see my slowdowns and unresponsive apps when new items are being added, like incoming SMSs and new pictures I've just taken. It seems crazy that a database in 2016 would have trouble with just a few thousand entries, but I can't help thinking that it's just got poor index performance. WAG, I admit.
But the cache thing is an interesting alternate theory. I'm gonna try that myself and hopefully prove myself wrong about the DB.
Edit: BentL, what constitutes too low? I see memory free 163 of 885 mb and swap free 188 of 255 mb, but I don't know what it should be for optimum performance.