Active Topics

 


Reply
Thread Tools
x61's Avatar
Posts: 932 | Thanked: 278 times | Joined on Sep 2009 @ Kentucky
#1
The question circulating around is: should Nokia drop the MeeGo and throw in Android?
 
Posts: 1,746 | Thanked: 2,100 times | Joined on Sep 2009
#2
No, because Nokia (and indeed, many others) don't like effectively being under the thumb of Google.

Despite it being open, the course Android takes and control over the code are squarely in Google's court. No one had the Froyo source until it was dropped by Google. In contrast, MeeGo development, once in the open stays in the open. It's also owned by the Linux Foundation, and not Intel or Nokia. With luck, MeeGo will end up being steered much like the Kernel itself.

And hell, -I- don't want it. That should be reason enough
 

The Following 55 Users Say Thank You to wmarone For This Useful Post:
pycage's Avatar
Posts: 3,404 | Thanked: 4,474 times | Joined on Oct 2005 @ Germany
#3
Why should they? Diversity is good, and Android is a phone OS, while MeeGo is designed for mobile computers.
__________________
Tidings - RSS and Podcast aggregator for Jolla - https://github.com/pycage/tidings
Cargo Dock - file/cloud manager for Jolla - https://github.com/pycage/cargodock
 

The Following 17 Users Say Thank You to pycage For This Useful Post:
NvyUs's Avatar
Posts: 1,885 | Thanked: 2,008 times | Joined on Aug 2009 @ OVI MAPS
#4
wrong time to ask this question when we have no idea how one will end up being, it could be 10x better than android or end up being lot worse, we have no idea of knowing yet so the question is stupid.
Ask it again after October and people will be able to give educated answer and not one based on hear say and guessing.
 

The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to NvyUs For This Useful Post:
Bundyo's Avatar
Posts: 4,708 | Thanked: 4,649 times | Joined on Oct 2007 @ Bulgaria
#5
Another day - another DIY analyst (read idiot).
__________________
Technically, there are three determinate states the cat could be in: Alive, Dead, and Bloody Furious.
 

The Following 12 Users Say Thank You to Bundyo For This Useful Post:
ysss's Avatar
Posts: 4,384 | Thanked: 5,524 times | Joined on Jul 2007 @ ˙ǝɹǝɥʍou
#6
Heh, that's actually a good and valid question in the current market. Kevin (Toffel) also thrown a few good numbers to support that question..

..but the chance of that happening is probably near zero... and Nokia will probably only consider Android if MeeGo completely fails in the market.

And I think that's just great.

Because MeeGo represents a contender with uniquely competent technical design and a proper ideology behind it... and it wouldn't take off if decisions are purely made based on financial and commercial considerations.

MeeGo deserves a chance
__________________
Class .. : Power User
Humor .. : [#####-----] | Alignment: Pragmatist
Patience : [###-------] | Weapon(s): Galaxy Note + BB Bold Touch 9900
Agro ... : [###-------] | Relic(s) : iPhone 4S, Atrix, Milestone, N900, N800, N95, HTC G1, Treos, Zauri, BB 9000, BB 9700, etc

Follow the MeeGo Coding Competition!
 

The Following 8 Users Say Thank You to ysss For This Useful Post:
Posts: 1,746 | Thanked: 2,100 times | Joined on Sep 2009
#7
Originally Posted by pycage View Post
Why should they? Diversity is good, and Android is a phone OS, while MeeGo is designed for mobile computers.
Being a "phone" is easily a subset of any mobile computer. Given the software and hardware, it's trivial. Android is Google's idea of "mobile computing," and it's not at all unworkable.

Manufacturers don't like playing second fiddle to Google with respect to control over the OS. With MeeGo, much like the kernel, they are on an even playing field with others.

That and drawing on upstream projects for subsystems means each smaller part gets much more focus than when the whole thing is built from scratch by one group.
 

The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to wmarone For This Useful Post:
Posts: 1,400 | Thanked: 3,751 times | Joined on Sep 2009 @ Arctic cold of northern .fi
#8
No.

We don't need Yet Another Android Manufacturer.

Nokia stopped making PC's after PC market became dominated by generic Wintel manufacturers. I very much doubt that it wants to become a generic Android manufacturer. Altough, if Nokia loses the mobile platform war then that is what we'll have: Android as default OS, and maybe Apple/iPhone having same kind of small niche as it has on PCs.
 

The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Rauha For This Useful Post:
ossipena's Avatar
Posts: 3,159 | Thanked: 2,023 times | Joined on Feb 2008 @ Finland
#9
android to non-touch devices. do I have to say more about that blog?

e: and did you notice the perspective?
O = ameeriikaa
. = rest of the world
__________________
Want to know something?
K.I.S.S. approach:
wiki category:beginners. Browse it through and you'll be much wiser!
If the link doesn't help, just use
Google Custom Search
 

The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to ossipena For This Useful Post:
efekt's Avatar
Posts: 422 | Thanked: 320 times | Joined on Oct 2009 @ Israel
#10
Wow! what an interesting concept for a discussion, which have never been discussed before, ground to dust, baked again just to be ground to even finer dust, and then left to dry in the fathoms of irrelevance...


In short - not THIS discussion again.... please...
 

The Following User Says Thank You to efekt For This Useful Post:
Reply


 
Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 17:39.