Active Topics
-
Is there a section to talk about Java ME? Apps, etc. (3)
to General by Kalatti - 1 day, 2 hrs ago - more...
 |
|
2011-04-16
, 13:57
|
|
Posts: 943 |
Thanked: 3,228 times |
Joined on Jun 2010
@ Zagreb
|
#22
|
No, most definitely no. But latest example from my point of view. Try to play reverstris on some android device and then on n900.
And browsing also. I don't have to zoom in and out on n900 like on X10.
And browsing also. I don't have to zoom in and out on n900 like on X10.
|
|
2011-04-16
, 14:04
|
|
Posts: 76 |
Thanked: 11 times |
Joined on Mar 2011
|
#23
|
N900 already has the best resistive screen i've used, so all I'd want for the next device is the same screen (w/any possible enhancements) + multitouch
this link shows that it can be implemented properly:
http://www.engadget.com/2009/02/19/s...face-on-video/
this link shows that it can be implemented properly:
http://www.engadget.com/2009/02/19/s...face-on-video/
|
|
2011-04-16
, 14:07
|
|
Posts: 76 |
Thanked: 11 times |
Joined on Mar 2011
|
#24
|
Originally Posted by kinggo
great point.. i love not having to zoon to use the browser
No, most definitely no. But latest example from my point of view. Try to play reverstris on some android device and then on n900.
And browsing also. I don't have to zoom in and out on n900 like on X10.
|
|
2011-04-16
, 14:12
|
|
Posts: 1,751 |
Thanked: 844 times |
Joined on Feb 2010
@ Sweden
|
#25
|
Originally Posted by maxximuscool
When it comes to durability and sensitivity the n900 screen is enough. I think more is just excessive. My mote point on capacitive is the "big button" and "ugly ui" problem. When they can overcome that i wouldn't mind capacitive. But that will probably take some years as the precision is simply not good enough and they need to backward compatible.
Yes it does indeed, but it is yet to commercialised. But even it has multitouch, it is still have leass sensitivity and still prone to scratch because of the thin plastic screen layer. I respect your decision but I reject your reality and for it I substitute my own. I am ready to move on and away from resistive. I don't think it's that bad at all. Resistive only use on LCD if I'm not mistaken. Capacitive uses less battery and came in variety of technology. Amoled, super Amoled, Super Amoled+, WGVA Amoled, nCdK, LCD...etc. Everyone know that LED screen has better colour and darker black.
In reality the resisitive already have my wanted technique and capacitive don't. So.. as of now resisitive win.
__________________
You like what i do? Donate!
Make your desktop look awesome - use the AwOken Theme with the AwOken Icon Theme.
Add me on twitter @almehdin
Visit the swedish maemo/meego community forums
You like what i do? Donate!
Make your desktop look awesome - use the AwOken Theme with the AwOken Icon Theme.
Add me on twitter @almehdin
Visit the swedish maemo/meego community forums
 |
|
2011-04-16
, 14:22
|
|
Posts: 412 |
Thanked: 480 times |
Joined on Feb 2011
@ Bronx, NY
|
#26
|
I voted capacitive only for multi touch if there was a resistive panel with multi I would choose that.
|
|
2011-04-16
, 14:30
|
|
Posts: 161 |
Thanked: 186 times |
Joined on Apr 2011
|
#27
|
If you want something that responds when touched in multiple places, go get a girlfriend 
kidding, I love the resistive, the only negative being the lesser screen brightness/clarity.
kidding, I love the resistive, the only negative being the lesser screen brightness/clarity.
|
|
2011-04-16
, 14:47
|
|
Posts: 161 |
Thanked: 186 times |
Joined on Apr 2011
|
#28
|
and relax guys, dont be too fanatic about your n900/nokia. agree it is the best device on the planet, and i am one of its biggest fanboys...
2 reasons:
1. IT hasn't achieved its true potential. I love my n900 not for what it is today, but for the potential it could have reached, had nokia leveraged it.... (f@kk u nokia). Example: despite having all the openGL technology, the only good native game it has got is Bounce... ~2 years, and not even NFSU or Asphalt have been built for it... What a waste of potential!.... Same with the fm transmitter, fm receiver combo, imagine what great apps or communication methods could have been achieved with that? All potential wasted!.
2. Nokia is a company that shamelessly cannot stick to its promises. Remember your long wait for PR1.2??? And for 5 years it has treated this beast of an OS, as an unwanted kid, only to finally trade it it off to some jacks@it operating system made by M$. Why be loyal to a company that treats it's customers like gullible a@@holes??? I will keep loving my phone till its death, but not the opportunistic nokia
2 reasons:
1. IT hasn't achieved its true potential. I love my n900 not for what it is today, but for the potential it could have reached, had nokia leveraged it.... (f@kk u nokia). Example: despite having all the openGL technology, the only good native game it has got is Bounce... ~2 years, and not even NFSU or Asphalt have been built for it... What a waste of potential!.... Same with the fm transmitter, fm receiver combo, imagine what great apps or communication methods could have been achieved with that? All potential wasted!.
2. Nokia is a company that shamelessly cannot stick to its promises. Remember your long wait for PR1.2??? And for 5 years it has treated this beast of an OS, as an unwanted kid, only to finally trade it it off to some jacks@it operating system made by M$. Why be loyal to a company that treats it's customers like gullible a@@holes??? I will keep loving my phone till its death, but not the opportunistic nokia
 |
|
2011-04-16
, 15:09
|
|
Posts: 762 |
Thanked: 395 times |
Joined on Jan 2010
@ Helsinki
|
#29
|
I think that I won't really have an option when the time comes to make a decision, as I think the capacitive nonsense has won the midshare in eyes of manufacturers.
I'm not going to debate which is better, as its all down to how well its implemented into overall user experience of the device in question. But obviously I have a personal preference towards resistive.
I'm not going to debate which is better, as its all down to how well its implemented into overall user experience of the device in question. But obviously I have a personal preference towards resistive.
__________________
--
Find me on Twitter: @creip
Please read my blog: "PeakMobility", which deals with MeeGo/Maemo, Windows Phone and mobile technology in general from a hedonistic user point-of-view: http://peakmob.blogspot.com/
--
Find me on Twitter: @creip
Please read my blog: "PeakMobility", which deals with MeeGo/Maemo, Windows Phone and mobile technology in general from a hedonistic user point-of-view: http://peakmob.blogspot.com/
| The Following User Says Thank You to cjp For This Useful Post: | ||
 |
|
2011-04-16
, 15:18
|
|
Posts: 909 |
Thanked: 216 times |
Joined on Nov 2009
@ Bremen, Germany
|
#30
|
my next device will be capacitive.
besides, i dont think there any other major proper mobile phones these days that come with resistive screens.
but i really love using a stylus, so that will be a minus. i hope stylus-supporting capacitive screens will become standard soon.
i remember seeing a video of resistive screens that support true multitouch. saw that video like 3 or 4 years ago. looks like it never made it to mainstream devices...
besides, i dont think there any other major proper mobile phones these days that come with resistive screens.
but i really love using a stylus, so that will be a minus. i hope stylus-supporting capacitive screens will become standard soon.
i remember seeing a video of resistive screens that support true multitouch. saw that video like 3 or 4 years ago. looks like it never made it to mainstream devices...
 |
| Tags |
| capacitive, compare, resistive, screen |
«
Previous Thread
|
Next Thread
»
|
All times are GMT. The time now is 03:20.
n900 screen gives me freedom, thats all!!!!!