|
2008-08-26
, 15:52
|
|
Posts: 1,605 |
Thanked: 1,601 times |
Joined on Mar 2007
@ Southern California
|
#2
|
|
2008-08-26
, 15:55
|
Posts: 64 |
Thanked: 19 times |
Joined on Feb 2008
|
#3
|
The Following User Says Thank You to johndoe32102002 For This Useful Post: | ||
|
2008-08-26
, 17:36
|
Posts: 2 |
Thanked: 0 times |
Joined on Jul 2008
|
#4
|
|
2008-08-27
, 04:14
|
|
Posts: 900 |
Thanked: 273 times |
Joined on Aug 2008
@ Fresno CA USA
|
#5
|
|
2008-08-27
, 04:20
|
|
Posts: 11,700 |
Thanked: 10,045 times |
Joined on Jun 2006
@ North Texas, USA
|
#6
|
The Following User Says Thank You to Texrat For This Useful Post: | ||
|
2008-08-29
, 22:18
|
Posts: 2 |
Thanked: 0 times |
Joined on Feb 2008
@ Willoughby, Ohio USA
|
#7
|
|
2008-08-29
, 22:33
|
|
Posts: 4,672 |
Thanked: 5,455 times |
Joined on Jul 2008
@ Springfield, MA, USA
|
#8
|
Actually I was surfing the internet fine on Tampa's WiMAX connection a few months ago Oh and I own the n810 not the W.E. lol so it seems the the face is the difference here ppl. oh and just for note their the connection runs from 100% downtown to 30% at Busch Gardens.
;>
|
2008-08-29
, 23:33
|
|
Posts: 198 |
Thanked: 273 times |
Joined on Jan 2006
@ Helsinki, Finland
|
#9
|
|
2008-08-30
, 00:09
|
Posts: 1,208 |
Thanked: 1,028 times |
Joined on Oct 2007
|
#10
|
Tags |
810 price, 810 vs 810w |
|
Since I'm in a city that isn't likely to see wimax, is there any justification to pay the extra $55 for the 810W? Also, does anyone expect the original n810 price to drop when the 810W officially hits store shelves?