Reply
Thread Tools
Community Council | Posts: 4,920 | Thanked: 12,867 times | Joined on May 2012 @ Southerrn Finland
#21
Originally Posted by XOleg View Post
I have error message "nothing provides patchmanager needed by sailfishos-patch-email-pulley-menu-0.1-1.noarch" from Storeman.
It is just RPM packaged patch, open the RPM and pull out the "unified_diff.patch" which you can then apply with patch
__________________
Dave999: Meateo balloons. What’s so special with em? Is it a ballon?
 

The Following User Says Thank You to juiceme For This Useful Post:
Community Council | Posts: 4,920 | Thanked: 12,867 times | Joined on May 2012 @ Southerrn Finland
#22
Originally Posted by kaari View Post
What patches works with 3.4. There is just important patches I prefer. eg. No home carusel, launcher combined... Would like to know.if those works on X2A. thanks
Well patches are made to be looked at
If a patch does not apply, you most often just need to readjust it a bit...
__________________
Dave999: Meateo balloons. What’s so special with em? Is it a ballon?
 

The Following User Says Thank You to juiceme For This Useful Post:
Posts: 42 | Thanked: 24 times | Joined on Feb 2013
#23
hello i made a clear install of latest os for my jolla1.
I cannot install any app from jolla store , give me error cannot install and cannot install storeman.
Try the command as root pkcon install zypper and get this error
fatal error : zypper-1.14.6-1.3.1.jolla.armv7hl requires libzypp.so.1702 but tis requirement cannot be provided any help?
 

The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to foufoutos For This Useful Post:
pichlo's Avatar
Posts: 6,445 | Thanked: 20,981 times | Joined on Sep 2012 @ UK
#24
You don't need zypper. Just run pkcon refresh.

(A decent OS update sequence would refresh the package cache automatically but that would be too much to expect, I suppose.)
__________________
Русский военный корабль, иди нахуй!
 

The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to pichlo For This Useful Post:
nonsuch's Avatar
Posts: 584 | Thanked: 1,550 times | Joined on Sep 2019
#25
Originally Posted by pichlo View Post
A decent OS update sequence would refresh the package cache automatically but that would be too much to expect, I suppose.
These are separate actions, and there's a good reason they're separate.
__________________
N900 in 2020
SFOS in 2021
 

The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to nonsuch For This Useful Post:
pichlo's Avatar
Posts: 6,445 | Thanked: 20,981 times | Joined on Sep 2012 @ UK
#26
Originally Posted by nonsuch View Post
These are separate actions, and there's a good reason they're separate.
What would that reason be, if I may ask?

"Hey, we are updating most packages on the system, almost certainly breaking the package cache consistency. But hey, let's keep updating the cache a 'separate action'. It makes perfect sense!"
__________________
Русский военный корабль, иди нахуй!
 

The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to pichlo For This Useful Post:
nonsuch's Avatar
Posts: 584 | Thanked: 1,550 times | Joined on Sep 2019
#27
Originally Posted by pichlo View Post
What would that reason be, if I may ask?

"Hey, we are updating most packages on the system, almost certainly breaking the package cache consistency. But hey, let's keep updating the cache a 'separate action'. It makes perfect sense!"
Wrong.
Take Debian stable for example:
You can keep installing packages that fit the current level of up-to-dateness of your system.
You can succesfully install software without updating the sources databases.
That makes sense.
Not for my personal habits, not for a rolling release distro, but it does make sense.

AFAIK Sailfish OS works on the same principles, it's a release-based distro with software catalogs stored locally.
__________________
N900 in 2020
SFOS in 2021

Last edited by nonsuch; 2020-10-22 at 10:02.
 

The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to nonsuch For This Useful Post:
pichlo's Avatar
Posts: 6,445 | Thanked: 20,981 times | Joined on Sep 2012 @ UK
#28
Originally Posted by nonsuch View Post
AFAIK Sailfish OS [is] a release-based distro with software catalogs stored locally.
I wish it were. I asked about that a hundred times. Why on earth do OS updates have to be huge, monolithic, 400+ MB releases? Why not release one package at a time, like every other Linux distribution under the sun? But no, Jolla knows better.

And then refuses to refresh the package cache.
__________________
Русский военный корабль, иди нахуй!
 

The Following 5 Users Say Thank You to pichlo For This Useful Post:
Posts: 42 | Thanked: 24 times | Joined on Feb 2013
#29
Originally Posted by pichlo View Post
You don't need zypper. Just run pkcon refresh.

(A decent OS update sequence would refresh the package cache automatically but that would be too much to expect, I suppose.)
nothing change . The same error
 

The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to foufoutos For This Useful Post:
peterleinchen's Avatar
Posts: 4,117 | Thanked: 8,901 times | Joined on Aug 2010 @ Ruhrgebiet, Germany
#30
Originally Posted by pichlo View Post
What would that reason be, if I may ask?

"Hey, we are updating most packages on the system, almost certainly breaking the package cache consistency. But hey, let's keep updating the cache a 'separate action'. It makes perfect sense!"
Especially as all packages are stored with their specific release on a repo which is tied to the OS release!
And still NOT publicly accesible!!!
__________________
SIM-Switcher, automated SIM switching with a Double (Dual) SIM adapter
--
Thank you all for voting me into the Community Council 2014-2016!

Please consider your membership / supporting Maemo e.V. and help to spread this by following/copying this link to your TMO signature:
[MC eV] Maemo Community eV membership application, http://talk.maemo.org/showthread.php?t=94257

editsignature, http://talk.maemo.org/profile.php?do=editsignature
 

The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to peterleinchen For This Useful Post:
Reply


 
Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 14:42.