Active Topics

 


Reply
Thread Tools
sachin007's Avatar
Posts: 2,041 | Thanked: 1,066 times | Joined on Mar 2006 @ Houston
#31
I really dont understand how nokia makes decisions....

1. They first came into the tochscreen space with the 7710. Then they thought touch screen is never good on a phone and went back to slider. If they would have kept working on the toch screen they would be the market leader in touch phones too.
2. Then there was apple iphone and they started reducing the size of the screen.
3. Now there are tablets everywhere and they are not making them.
4 Then there is the biggest blunder of wasting time and resorces for symbian in touch phones

A lot depends for nokia on the n9
 

The Following 6 Users Say Thank You to sachin007 For This Useful Post:
danramos's Avatar
Posts: 4,672 | Thanked: 5,455 times | Joined on Jul 2008 @ Springfield, MA, USA
#32
Originally Posted by Texrat View Post
Let's keep this thread just about tablets and slate PCs, please, thanks.
What is the N900? I thought there were a number of people arguing it was a tablet or a computer-first, while the other (Nokia's own marketing included) argues it's a phone first.

Is the N900 a tablet? Clearly, Nokia marketed the 770/N8x0's as tablets.
 

The Following User Says Thank You to danramos For This Useful Post:
Texrat's Avatar
Posts: 11,700 | Thanked: 10,045 times | Joined on Jun 2006 @ North Texas, USA
#33
Originally Posted by danramos View Post
What is the N900? I thought there were a number of people arguing it was a tablet or a computer-first, while the other (Nokia's own marketing included) argues it's a phone first.

Is the N900 a tablet? Clearly, Nokia marketed the 770/N8x0's as tablets.
My comment had to do with the off-topic rant I quoted.

But where does Nokia's marketing declare the N900 is a phone first? The official designation is mobile computer.
__________________
Nokia Developer Champion
Different <> Wrong | Listen - Judgment = Progress | People + Trust = Success
My personal site: http://texrat.net
 
danramos's Avatar
Posts: 4,672 | Thanked: 5,455 times | Joined on Jul 2008 @ Springfield, MA, USA
#34
Originally Posted by Texrat View Post
My comment had to do with the off-topic rant I quoted.

But where does Nokia's marketing declare the N900 is a phone first? The official designation is mobile computer.
...but... but...

http://www.nokia.co.uk/find-products...andn900_228x96
 
Texrat's Avatar
Posts: 11,700 | Thanked: 10,045 times | Joined on Jun 2006 @ North Texas, USA
#35
Originally Posted by danramos View Post
...but... but...

http://www.nokia.co.uk/find-products...andn900_228x96
Thanks for showing me a "where". Of course lower on the page they got it correct.

They screwed up on the N800 too: it was listed under Phones. That caused massive confusion. I tried many times to get that corrected, no luck.

A separate tablet-oriented category is needed... "mobile computers" could work.
__________________
Nokia Developer Champion
Different <> Wrong | Listen - Judgment = Progress | People + Trust = Success
My personal site: http://texrat.net
 

The Following User Says Thank You to Texrat For This Useful Post:
Posts: 4,556 | Thanked: 1,624 times | Joined on Dec 2007
#36
Haha, I think Nokia Marketing listing the n800 as a phone is a clear indicator that marketing has no clue what they're doing. =P
__________________
Originally Posted by ysss View Post
They're maemo and MeeGo...

"Meamo!" sounds like what Zorro would say to catherine zeta jones... after she slaps him for looking at her dirtily...
 

The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Laughing Man For This Useful Post:
Guest | Posts: n/a | Thanked: 0 times | Joined on
#37
Originally Posted by Laughing Man View Post
Haha, I think Nokia Marketing listing the n800 as a phone is a clear indicator that marketing has no clue what they're doing.
They've called my N810 a phone too when it came back from repairs. I can only blame marketing so much before I start blaming sheer ignorance.

But the whole mobile computer/internet tablet/whatever name is really not too bad. I just hate the fact that Nokia had the friggin' edge on what's out there now and just didn't stick to their guns when they should have, imho.

Would've, could've, should've... I just don't like the iPad.
 

The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to For This Useful Post:
Texrat's Avatar
Posts: 11,700 | Thanked: 10,045 times | Joined on Jun 2006 @ North Texas, USA
#38
__________________
Nokia Developer Champion
Different <> Wrong | Listen - Judgment = Progress | People + Trust = Success
My personal site: http://texrat.net
 

The Following User Says Thank You to Texrat For This Useful Post:
ysss's Avatar
Posts: 4,384 | Thanked: 5,524 times | Joined on Jul 2007 @ ˙ǝɹǝɥʍou
#39
Originally Posted by sachin007 View Post
I really dont understand how nokia makes decisions....

1. They first came into the tochscreen space with the 7710. Then they thought touch screen is never good on a phone and went back to slider. If they would have kept working on the toch screen they would be the market leader in touch phones too.
2. Then there was apple iphone and they started reducing the size of the screen.
3. Now there are tablets everywhere and they are not making them.
4 Then there is the biggest blunder of wasting time and resorces for symbian in touch phones

A lot depends for nokia on the n9
That's why you shouldn't blindly trust a brand.
__________________
Class .. : Power User
Humor .. : [#####-----] | Alignment: Pragmatist
Patience : [###-------] | Weapon(s): Galaxy Note + BB Bold Touch 9900
Agro ... : [###-------] | Relic(s) : iPhone 4S, Atrix, Milestone, N900, N800, N95, HTC G1, Treos, Zauri, BB 9000, BB 9700, etc

Follow the MeeGo Coding Competition!
 

The Following User Says Thank You to ysss For This Useful Post:
Reply


 
Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 18:36.