Active Topics

 


Closed Thread
Thread Tools
danramos's Avatar
Posts: 4,672 | Thanked: 5,455 times | Joined on Jul 2008 @ Springfield, MA, USA
#301
Originally Posted by st5150 View Post
I've never used dpkg though... help?
Quickie answer here: dpkg -i packagename.deb
__________________
Nokia's slogan shouldn't be the pedo-palmgrabbing image with the slogan, "Connecting People"... It should be one hand open pleadingly with another hand giving the middle finger and the more apt slogan, "Potential Unrealized." --DR
 
Posts: 373 | Thanked: 56 times | Joined on Dec 2005 @ Ottawa, ON
#302
Originally Posted by Jaffa View Post
...which, of course, was supposed to be an example list; not definitive (if I knew, I could fix the problems ;-))
Ya ... I realize that. I was just being sarcastic since people seemed to be using that as the canonical list of reasons why they should entirely dismiss people having issues.

Originally Posted by Jaffa View Post
rtcomm-beta's an interesting idea. qole had that installed at the summit, might prove to be a data point.
It is pretty intrusively replacing core bits but I found it really stable.

I am pretty sure that I had rtcomm-beta install before the last SSU and it went fine. There may have been an update to rtcomm-beta since then though. So if that is the culprit, that would narrow down the list of causes. Maybe I will reflash back to the old firmware again and try to cause it just by installing that one package.

Is it possible to cleanly "uninstall" the SSU package and revert back the the pre-installed state or is it the case where the SSU package is just a meta package that drags all the required updates in and is non-reversible?
 
Posts: 674 | Thanked: 191 times | Joined on Mar 2008 @ Buenos Aires, Argentina
#303
I did not have rtcomm-beta nor pidgin installed in my N810 and suffered the death loop. I had Gizmo, though.
 
Posts: 1,101 | Thanked: 1,184 times | Joined on Aug 2008 @ Spain
#304
I have gone through 4 update installations to be finally able to know what fails and gather that information (1->reboot cycle-teeth gnashing, 2->white screen of death-head banging, 3->success, 4->document and check fixes)

I put this here in the hope it can help those of you who haven't still updated to avoid failure.
The first issue is the big update size. Make sure you have plenty of space before trying.
Second, you better make a backup of your system if you haven't done so (see this post http://www.internettablettalk.com/fo...8&postcount=31) and want to avoid a full reflash. Once you have a rootfs backup save the file in your PC to be able to reflash it with flasher, if things go wrong. If you have a bootable system in mmc, just do a tgz backup.

Now, lets start with all the issues I have found:

- The update can't be installed if sliderotate is installed. Simply uninstall sliderotate. Same with certain flash patch, it is documented in this thread (I do not have that patch)

- The update contains 32 deb archives. That in itself is not an issue, but, given how the package manager/apt works, means that if only one of such packages doesn't install, all packages will remain unconfigured leaving the system broken unless fixed by hand. So, for this very reason, use apt-get to install the update, and do not reboot if the update fails unless you have no other option.

- apt and the nokia repositories are updated too, if the update fails, the nokia repositories are borked and you won't be able to fix the system unless you already have all packages. Pre-download all packages first with "apt-get -d install osso-software-version-rx44"

- The update contains a documentation package. This package causes a lot of trouble, because it fails if the user has moved, removed or linked the documentation files:
It fails if there is no files in "/usr/share/pre-installed/MyDocs/.documents/". Create that directory and touch or put a file there if you have that deleted.
It fails if the "/home/user/MyDocs/.documents/osso_software_copyright.pdf" file is a symlink
It fails if the "/home/user/MyDocs/.documents/~sfil_li_folder_user_guides/" directory is a symlink or is empty. Make sure you have an actual directory with any file there.

- The init.d handling scripts are prone to fail, and because dpkg is not robust and/or post-install scripts have poor error recovery, causes the "dangling symlink /etc/rc2.d" problem. This problem doesn't affect everyone, and only happens on some packages. I think it is relate to how the post-install script passes arguments to the "invoke-rc.d" script, but I have to investigate further. In this update, the packages tablet-browser-daemon, mce, ke-recv and icd2 are affected by this problem and their installation will fail.
The best way to get rid of this problem once and forever is to edit the "/usr/sbin/invoke-rc.d" script and make sure it never fails the symlink check. There is already a thread about this in ITT. I have attached the fixed script here, so just copy it to /usr/sbin
A worse way to fix this is to delete the /etc/rc2.d related files (S99tablet-browser-daemon, S21mce, S30ke-recv, S59icd2) when the installation fails, then after successfully installing those packages (using "dpkg -i" because apt-get won't work) you'll have to create by hand those symlinks or otherwise the following things will not work right: usb, screen keyboard, network, power-off button. Those packages are tricky to get installed because they need other packages configured before installing, so you need to run "apt-get -y -f install" before "dpkg -i"

- Do not work through a ssh shell and don't let the tablet enter power-save mode. One of the packages is the network daemon (icd2) and will be shut down when installing, cutting off your shell. Since also mce is being reinstalled and has been shut down too, if you tablet enters power save mode you won't be able to regain control of it or even properly turn it off, leaving no other option than to remove the battery.

- It is possible to reboot with the update not configured if the only packages not installed are tablet-browser-daemon, mce, ke-recv, icd2 and the documentation, and then finish the installation by hand. Failure before that probably means endless reboot cycle.

- If the update has failed but you have been able to complete installation by hand, you have to "flash-and-reboot" to install the new kernel and initfs
Attached Files
File Type: gz invoke-rc.d.gz (3.8 KB, 245 views)

Last edited by maacruz; 2008-10-02 at 00:35.
 

The Following 27 Users Say Thank You to maacruz For This Useful Post:
Posts: 609 | Thanked: 232 times | Joined on Dec 2007 @ the end of my rope
#305
Originally Posted by maacruz View Post
The update can't be installed if sliderotate is installed.
While I had my problems with this update, having sliderotate installed wasn't one of them...unless sliderotate was responsible for removing osso-software-version, and uninstalling would have put it back. Even if it was responsible for that, reinstalling osso-software did the trick. Once the system updated, I just reinstalled sliderotate kernel from within sliderotate settings, and I was good to go.
 
Posts: 1,101 | Thanked: 1,184 times | Joined on Aug 2008 @ Spain
#306
Originally Posted by lm2 View Post
While I had my problems with this update, having sliderotate installed wasn't one of them...unless sliderotate was responsible for removing osso-software-version, and uninstalling would have put it back. Even if it was responsible for that, reinstalling osso-software did the trick. Once the system updated, I just reinstalled sliderotate kernel from within sliderotate settings, and I was good to go.
It gave me a conflict with xserver-xomap, and didn't go away until I uninstalled sliderotate.
 
Benson's Avatar
Posts: 4,930 | Thanked: 2,272 times | Joined on Oct 2007
#307
Recent versions of sliderotate do not conflict with osso-software-version-rx?4-unlocked; in any event uninstalling sliderotate would not restore that... Some early rotation packages did force removing an osso-software-version, but I think since the first SSU they've been largely ok.

Removing osso-software-version-rx?4-unlocked is an additional cause, however it happens, and can (AFAIK) only really be fixed ahead of time by installing it again.
 
Posts: 190 | Thanked: 54 times | Joined on Dec 2007
#308
I almost feel guilty in saying that my update went off without a hitch, but it did and thank the Gods for that because based on my topsy turvy life, I just need stress free gadgets right now and after a weekend of restoring a windows xp pc from scratch, the last thing I needed would have been a infinite boot loop issue on my N810. Just sort of stunned that so many users are having so many issues with this upgrade.
 
Texrat's Avatar
Posts: 11,700 | Thanked: 10,045 times | Joined on Jun 2006 @ North Texas, USA
#309
Originally Posted by danramos View Post
Also, disagreements. I disagree.
Key word was tend (I even emphasized it in the original post).

And if ya like, I can prove my premise with stats. I didn't get hired as a data analyst for my good looks.
__________________
Nokia Developer Champion
Different <> Wrong | Listen - Judgment = Progress | People + Trust = Success
My personal site: http://texrat.net
 
Posts: 64 | Thanked: 10 times | Joined on Feb 2008
#310
Originally Posted by mwiktowy View Post
So that (and GA and several other "power-users" reporting no big issues) kind of blows away the theory that it is only power-users have this reboot-loop issue.

So let's try to find the common thread that is definitely causing some issues with many people that are not using their tablets in exotic ways.

The only things that I had on my tablet that could possibly be considered non-standard are:
1) rtcomm beta
2) chinook base and extras repos in order to install some old apps that hadn't been moved over.

Are either of these two commonalities anong other people having issues that don't fit into the "5 stages of self-doomed hackerdom" as outlined by Jaffa?

PS ... just to add that it is an N810 that I have that I had SSU issues with.
I updated two N800's today, and both went fine. I did notice that when the devices were being halted at the end of the update, there was a period of time where the screen went dark, but the device wasn't fully shut down. The screen actually faded twice -- once from the hildon UI down to a powered dark screen (a very odd fade away), then later the LCD powered down completely. It looked down for a while, but wasn't quite.

Once shut down, I could start the devices again with no issues. Pressing the power button let the LED light up, device booted etc.

Are people being patient enough during the halt? Are files being corrupted if the battery is being yanked during the final writes out to flash memory?

Just one observation.
 
Closed Thread

Tags
diablo, os2008, ssu, upgrade


 
Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 03:21.