Reply
Thread Tools
Posts: 220 | Thanked: 129 times | Joined on Nov 2009
#31
Originally Posted by Kangal View Post
You guys know that Samsung definitively said they will not utilize WebOS. If they disagree to WebOS, what makes people think they will choose MeeGo?

So far they're strategy is to sell Android Smartphones and Bada Feature-Phones. They've got their fingers also dipped into Symbian (dumbphones), Windows Mobile (feature phones), and Windows Phone 7 (as a me-too alternative).
As I said, hedging their bets. I think your question is a valid one regarding why Meego if WebOS is a no, no for Samsung. Perhaps the connection to Intel? What other reasons could there be? The Linux kernel? Open source development?

PS. I hadn't seen Helmuths post before I replied DS.

Last edited by Gadgety; 2011-09-06 at 12:28.
 
Posts: 220 | Thanked: 129 times | Joined on Nov 2009
#32
Originally Posted by patlak View Post
Software wasn't at fault, it was hardware. ...Their current failure is only a result of their poor management.

EDIT: They couldn't even bring promised OVI Maps navigation to the N900.
I agree on poor management, likely also poor communication and understanding between software and hardware developers, as well as a likely high cost focus logic in a mass producer trying to shift over to high end phones/tablets/computers, a poor understanding of market, or at least a poor acceptance of the market changes when iPhone hit.

Regarding the OVI maps, they are on the N9, so in the end they arrived; not to excuse any Nokia failure to deliver on their promises
(I'm not aware that they promised the OVI maps for the N900, but I've been away from the forum for a couple of years.)
 
volt's Avatar
Posts: 1,309 | Thanked: 1,187 times | Joined on Nov 2008
#33
Originally Posted by bbin View Post
LOL, they might try doing couple of handsets as an experiment and then give up.
pfff, I would actually like that. That'd already be twice as many handsets as Maemo.

Originally Posted by Helmuth View Post
Perhaps because for MeeGo is alien dalvik aviable and for bada not?

So they would be able to create their own unique device and would be still compatible to all those android apps.
If Samsung wanted Alien Dalvik, they wouldn't need to go through Maemo/MeeGo to get it. They would only need to arch an eyebrow in the right direction. Oh, and pay the developers some. Those who built Alien Dalvik would be just too happy to deliver to Samsung, or anyone, really, as opposed to not delivering to anyone like they do now.
__________________
Qwerty is hot? Stylus or not? Let the buyer decide! The Nokia ¹ Smartphone - Build your ¹
 

The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to volt For This Useful Post:
Helmuth's Avatar
Posts: 1,259 | Thanked: 1,341 times | Joined on Oct 2009 @ Germany
#34
...or they are simply only interested in MeeGo for cheap Netbooks...
 
Posts: 273 | Thanked: 463 times | Joined on May 2011 @ Athens
#35
The point is that is higjhly unlikely to have a samsung meego device sooner than 2013. The only thing I can see as plausible is samsung wanting to play with it and take a Nokia approach as an experimental OS and nothiong more.
 

The Following User Says Thank You to Zoxir For This Useful Post:
marxian's Avatar
Posts: 2,448 | Thanked: 9,523 times | Joined on Aug 2010 @ Wigan, UK
#36
Originally Posted by Helmuth View Post
...or they are simply only interested in MeeGo for cheap Netbooks...
Netbooks are a bit passé, aren't they? I quite like mine, but I think most consumers prefer fondleslabs for their use cases.
__________________
'Men of high position are allowed, by a special act of grace, to accomodate their reasoning to the answer they need. Logic is only required in those of lesser rank.' - J K Galbraith

My website

GitHub
 

The Following User Says Thank You to marxian For This Useful Post:
Posts: 411 | Thanked: 195 times | Joined on May 2010 @ Cambridge, UK
#37
Originally Posted by marxian View Post
Netbooks are a bit passé, aren't they? I quite like mine, but I think most consumers prefer fondleslabs for their use cases.
Hehe... Fondleslabs...
 
Posts: 161 | Thanked: 186 times | Joined on Apr 2011
#38
Samsung can still build bada on top of Meego core??

If they do, they have a platform with most linux capabilities, and 6000 apps already prebuilt....

With a possibility of qt, alien dalvik etc, they could be then truly powerful
 
afaq's Avatar
Posts: 1,038 | Thanked: 1,408 times | Joined on Feb 2010 @ London
#39
- Android
- Bada
- WP7

and now Meego? Samsung Note looks tasty and is almost exactly where I would have liked Meego to be now.
__________________
Graphic and Calligraphy Designer
check out my site www.afaqali.com
 

The Following User Says Thank You to afaq For This Useful Post:
danramos's Avatar
Posts: 4,672 | Thanked: 5,455 times | Joined on Jul 2008 @ Springfield, MA, USA
#40
Originally Posted by bbin View Post
Pipe dreams. MeeGo is and will be another failure to commercialise FOSS. No Korean company will change it.
DO NOT UNDERESTIMATE THE KoREANS!!!
__________________
Nokia's slogan shouldn't be the pedo-palmgrabbing image with the slogan, "Connecting People"... It should be one hand open pleadingly with another hand giving the middle finger and the more apt slogan, "Potential Unrealized." --DR
 

The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to danramos For This Useful Post:
Reply

Tags
false, no chance of a


 
Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 13:43.