Active Topics
-
Is there a section to talk about Java ME? Apps, etc. (0)
to General by Kalatti - 2 days, 13 hrs ago -
Extra softwares in Sailfish using CLI, repositories, etc (117)
to SailfishOS by nieldk - 4 days, 10 hrs ago -
Firefox with Leste (6)
to Maemo 7 / Leste by teroyk - 5 days, 7 hrs ago - more...
| The Following User Says Thank You to nodevel For This Useful Post: | ||
|
2014-11-18
, 13:13
|
|
Posts: 307 |
Thanked: 1,460 times |
Joined on May 2011
@ Switzerland
|
#62
|
Originally Posted by sicelo
Just noticed it's an x86 tablet. What are they up to there then? Would an ARM device violate the deal with MS?
Intel Atom processor .. sounds like there are good chances a proper Linux can be installed here, am I wrong?
|
|
2014-11-18
, 13:25
|
|
Posts: 207 |
Thanked: 552 times |
Joined on Jul 2011
|
#63
|
Originally Posted by Jedibeeftrix
Not supported by the chip.
i love that they used the Type-C USB physical interface, but they could have used USB 3.0 electrical interface rather than USB 2.0.
| The Following User Says Thank You to switch-hitter For This Useful Post: | ||
|
|
2014-11-18
, 13:30
|
|
Posts: 207 |
Thanked: 552 times |
Joined on Jul 2011
|
#64
|
Interesting business model though, license their design and the Nokia brand name to third party manufacturers.
 |
|
2014-11-18
, 13:30
|
|
Posts: 1,236 |
Thanked: 1,278 times |
Joined on Aug 2011
@ Balochistan
|
#65
|
Originally Posted by billranton
I think its x64 as stated in gsmarena's page.
Just noticed it's an x86 tablet. What are they up to there then? Would an ARM device violate the deal with MS?
Code:
64-bit 2.3GHz Intel Atom Z3580 processor, PowerVR G6430 GPU with 2GB RAM
__________________
N900 Firmware files with Flasher Linux+Windows
N900 Firmware files with Flasher Linux+Windows
|
|
2014-11-18
, 13:30
|
|
Posts: 209 |
Thanked: 150 times |
Joined on Feb 2010
@ York, Pa., USA
|
#66
|
Originally Posted by switch-hitter
What chip?
Not supported by the chip.
|
|
2014-11-18
, 13:31
|
|
Posts: 337 |
Thanked: 891 times |
Joined on Jul 2012
@ Royaume Uni.
|
#67
|
Originally Posted by nodevel
That is not true according to this - https://gigaom.com/2014/11/18/non-mi...nd-z-launcher/
It is being manufactured by Foxconn which has one interesting implication:
It cannot contain Google Play (or any Google Play services) even if Nokia wanted. Foxconn also makes Kindle Fire which is against Google's rules and no device they make will therefore pass the Google Play certification.
(source: Reddit)
The N1 will also use the Z Launcher, which it launched in June, on top of Android “Lollipop” 5.0. And yes, that’s not a fork and it will include Google Play “in markets where Google Play is available”, a Nokia spokesman told me — in other words, probably not in China, where Google Play doesn’t handle paid apps and many Google services are in any case blocked these days.
| The Following User Says Thank You to NokiaFanatic For This Useful Post: | ||
|
|
2014-11-18
, 14:33
|
|
Posts: 209 |
Thanked: 150 times |
Joined on Feb 2010
@ York, Pa., USA
|
#70
|
usb 2.0 is a deal breaker! 
If the bootloader is unlocked and this device had a usb 3.0 port it would be a day one purchase.
If the bootloader is unlocked and this device had a usb 3.0 port it would be a day one purchase.
It cannot contain Google Play (or any Google Play services) even if Nokia wanted. Foxconn also makes Kindle Fire which is against Google's rules and no device they make will therefore pass the Google Play certification.
(source: Reddit)