|
2011-02-13
, 18:51
|
|
Posts: 1,839 |
Thanked: 2,432 times |
Joined on May 2009
|
#12
|
|
2011-02-13
, 18:58
|
Posts: 457 |
Thanked: 600 times |
Joined on Jan 2010
|
#13
|
In WinPhone is successful, then Nokia is also dead. In this case Microsoft sends Nokia a kiss and goes on to sell OEM licenses to HTC, LG, Samsung, etc. Nokia is left to compete as just-another-OEM on a playing field where they cannot win.
|
2011-02-13
, 19:12
|
|
Posts: 103 |
Thanked: 162 times |
Joined on Jan 2010
@ Germany
|
#14
|
|
2011-02-13
, 19:14
|
|
Posts: 1,296 |
Thanked: 1,773 times |
Joined on Aug 2009
@ Budapest, Hungary
|
#15
|
I wonder why can't Nokia just keep Symbian alive for low end and truly keep the Qt alive and kicking inside Nokia.
|
2011-02-13
, 19:18
|
Posts: 457 |
Thanked: 600 times |
Joined on Jan 2010
|
#16
|
Nokia and Microsoft will each contribute services and technology to one another and co-brand the collaborations. For example, Nokia will integrate with Bing and maybe call it “Nokia search, powered by Bing,” while Microsoft will integrate Nokia’s Maps services into its search engine and maybe call it “Bing Maps, powered by Nokia.” No definitive branding has been established yet.
|
2011-02-13
, 19:19
|
Guest |
Posts: n/a |
Thanked: 0 times |
Joined on
|
#17
|
|
2011-02-13
, 19:21
|
|
Posts: 11,700 |
Thanked: 10,045 times |
Joined on Jun 2006
@ North Texas, USA
|
#18
|
|
2011-02-13
, 19:22
|
Posts: 163 |
Thanked: 256 times |
Joined on May 2010
|
#19
|
I don't know the details of the deal, so I won't rule that out.
But if Nokia provides key services to the wp7 ecosystem MS cannot easily get rid of them.
The problem is nobody knows nokia is behind those services, so they are not associated with the nokia brand.
Honestly I still think Symbian/Meego/Qt and OVI services would have been the better option, but I can at least see a logic behind the decision.
The Following User Says Thank You to tkatchev For This Useful Post: | ||
|
2011-02-13
, 19:25
|
Posts: 163 |
Thanked: 256 times |
Joined on May 2010
|
#20
|
If WinPhone tanks, then Nokia is dead. (Since they have placed all their bets on the WinPhone and just destroyed whatever backup plan they might have had.)
In WinPhone is successful, then Nokia is also dead. In this case Microsoft sends Nokia a kiss and goes on to sell OEM licenses to HTC, LG, Samsung, etc. Nokia is left to compete as just-another-OEM on a playing field where they cannot win.
This so-called "partnership" benefits Microsoft and only Microsoft: it gives WinPhone (a very unfinished OS and a very risky platform) a buffer of one-two years to beta-test on a large, international base of consumers.