Active Topics

 


Reply
Thread Tools
HellFlyer's Avatar
Posts: 1,148 | Thanked: 613 times | Joined on Mar 2010 @ Toronto
#11
If I recall correctly OP was the one who was really excited to have fully working Andrioid ( opened multiple treads etc) on N900 and now this useless thread...

So I conclude
1. You're trolling
2. You're an Android fanboy
3. You're promoting nitdroid and you're doing it wrong
__________________
The quieter you become the more you are able to hear


"I'm a N900 user, can I haz Flash 10 plz?!11!?" © Jaffa


Elopocalypse started on 11.02.2011
 

The Following User Says Thank You to HellFlyer For This Useful Post:
juise-'s Avatar
Posts: 186 | Thanked: 192 times | Joined on Jan 2010 @ Finland
#12
Originally Posted by ysss View Post
Wasn't that 3G-only? Can you use that over Wifi?
I don't see why not. Bits is bits is bits. Implementations might have been 3G only, then again, Wifi in phones hasn't been all that common until recently.

IIRC 3G video calls use SIP to build the video connection, so it should work for the usual inernet telephony. Also on the positive side was that video codecs were likely defined in the standard. I'm assuming the Android implementation can only call other Androids, so we have another interoperability barrier.
__________________
Trout have underwater weapons.
 
Posts: 1,258 | Thanked: 672 times | Joined on Mar 2009
#13
Well 3g video calling is probably a bit like mms, a "not-invented-here" reinvention that requires you to connect to a different APN.. but I'm just guessing...

Almost everything has a 3g version, IM, photo sharing, video sharing, voice IMs (also known as PTT and walkie-talkie mode)
 
Reply

Tags
n900s, nitdroid, trololololo, videocalling


 
Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 03:18.