|
2005-12-28
, 11:26
|
Posts: 41 |
Thanked: 0 times |
Joined on Dec 2005
@ Brasil
|
#12
|
|
2005-12-28
, 22:35
|
Posts: 28 |
Thanked: 2 times |
Joined on Nov 2005
|
#13
|
The dead pixels are Nokia's problem first, and the OEM's second.
|
2005-12-28
, 23:48
|
|
Posts: 3,220 |
Thanked: 326 times |
Joined on Oct 2005
@ "Almost there!" (Monte Christo, Count of)
|
#14
|
I have always thought that the dead pixels are something that LCD (or TFT) technology brings with it and the manufacturer cant do a lot to prevent the dead pixels (except of course test the screens properly).
So did I just understood what you said differently or is it possible to make LCD/TFT-screens where dead pixels dont appear or are extremely rare?
|
2005-12-29
, 15:32
|
Posts: 41 |
Thanked: 0 times |
Joined on Dec 2005
@ Brasil
|
#15
|
It's a matter of quality control and how much you are prepared to screw over your customers.
LCD screens are not unlike giant integrated circuits and like those, there is some fallout in the manufacturing process. An honest manufacturer will only keep the flawless ones, but there's always the temptation to say: "Weeellll... it's only one pixel, who's gonna notice?"
Apparently Nokia must think its customers are stark raving blind...
|
2005-12-30
, 14:16
|
Posts: 3 |
Thanked: 0 times |
Joined on Dec 2005
|
#16
|
It is of course reasonable and smart to start negotiation with the retailer from a position of courtesy and friendliness and retain this attitude throughout as much as possible. This is better for peace on earth in general, and the health of your own digestive system.
It was only when phrases like "You are out of luck", and "There is really nothng we can do" came up im my experience that the gloves were loosened slightly.
Good luck!
cAPS