Active Topics

 


Reply
Thread Tools
Posts: 566 | Thanked: 150 times | Joined on Dec 2007
#11
Originally Posted by dont View Post
Q3. XUL has always looked really interesting but I have never got my head around it enough to decide if I want to invest time learning to use it. That, plus the vague feeling that it might only be an internal project used by Mozilla - not really a well-supported, well-documented development environment. Was I wrong about this, or is the outlook for XUL about to change?
It might be worthwile just for the purpose of studying how the separation of presentation and logic is done in XUL. The basic concepts stay relevant and are also used in .Net (XAML) for example. Even if XUL would never go beyond Firefox.

Last edited by iamthewalrus; 2008-09-02 at 17:50.
 
Bundyo's Avatar
Posts: 4,708 | Thanked: 4,649 times | Joined on Oct 2007 @ Bulgaria
#12
I'm running it since today on my box (not tablet - its quite faster than 2.0 You can't get me to compile it though
__________________
Technically, there are three determinate states the cat could be in: Alive, Dead, and Bloody Furious.

Last edited by Bundyo; 2008-09-02 at 20:19.
 
qole's Avatar
Moderator | Posts: 7,109 | Thanked: 8,820 times | Joined on Oct 2007 @ Vancouver, BC, Canada
#13
Well, I'm not ticked that you're running Shredder on your x86 (I think that's what your post said), I'd be ticked if you said, "I've compiled it for my tablet, it runs well, but I had to modify the make files extensively... No, you can't have any of my work..."
__________________
qole.org --- twitter --- Easy Debian wiki page
Please don't send me a private message, post to the appropriate thread.
Thank you all for your donations!
 

The Following User Says Thank You to qole For This Useful Post:
Reply


 
Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 23:46.