|
2015-11-22
, 10:35
|
|
Posts: 6,445 |
Thanked: 20,981 times |
Joined on Sep 2012
@ UK
|
#12
|
|
2015-11-22
, 11:52
|
|
Moderator |
Posts: 3,715 |
Thanked: 7,419 times |
Joined on Dec 2009
@ Bize Her Yer Trabzon
|
#13
|
I say, ditch the moderators too!
(I have to say, there has been much less moderation in the past 6 months than in the 6 months before and I have to say, it was for the best.)
|
2015-11-22
, 11:57
|
|
Posts: 6,445 |
Thanked: 20,981 times |
Joined on Sep 2012
@ UK
|
#14
|
|
2015-11-22
, 11:58
|
|
Moderator |
Posts: 3,715 |
Thanked: 7,419 times |
Joined on Dec 2009
@ Bize Her Yer Trabzon
|
#15
|
|
2015-11-22
, 19:43
|
Posts: 1,203 |
Thanked: 3,027 times |
Joined on Dec 2010
|
#16
|
|
2016-04-13
, 06:44
|
Posts: 1,994 |
Thanked: 3,342 times |
Joined on Jun 2010
@ N900: Battery low. N950: torx 4 re-used once and fine; SIM port torn apart
|
#17
|
Originally Posted by reinobInteresting idea, however I fear that the forum SW does not fold to that easily...We might also want to consider an opt-in/opt-out filter. People who haven't opted-out (and possible not logged in users, e.g. search engines) will get swearwods filtered out *on-the-fly*, i.e. while serving the page.
Users who have opted-out of the filter will get the "raw" content.
It sure is possible to do something like that but might require rewriting a lot of code!
Originally Posted by reinobI think we'll soon be ready to organize an election, if only for the fück of it. Oops.
Based on the strong reaction of community to this topic I know we now need an election.
I'd tend to go full-freedom-of-speech (because *we* can!).
(For everything else, and when/as needed, we have our moderators..)