View Single Post
olf's Avatar
Posts: 304 | Thanked: 1,246 times | Joined on Aug 2015
#7
Originally Posted by nonsuch View Post
[...]
What's wrong with staying with this "ancient" Qt version for - ever, maybe?
  • Security
    It is unmaintained upstream, for years in case of Qt.
  • Functionality
    Well, I think @rinigus and others could write long lists of functions in newer Qt versions, which would make programming for it much easier, plus the loss of interoperability of software not specifically for SailfishOS, because all other Linux distributions are on a way newer Qt.
Both aspects were the main incentives for Jolla to update most of SailfishOS' basic tools and utilities (GCC & Co., GNU-utilities / Busybox etc. etc.) over the past two years.
This is why it is obvious that they have to resolve this, and I wish this would happen rather sooner than later (even better: long ago!), because the severeness of the impacts of this issue are permanently increasing (until on a Qt version, which is maintained upstream).

Last edited by olf; 2020-11-09 at 20:42. Reason: Typo
 

The Following 7 Users Say Thank You to olf For This Useful Post: