In all fairness, that "within a year" clause is ambiguous. It could mean "within a year from this announcement" or "within a year from the first part". Which again could be interpreted in more than one way. From the beginning or the end of the first part?

I am usually a devoted advocate of Hanlon's razor but, given Jolla's track record, I find it hard not to be cynical and assume the ambiguity was intentional.