View Single Post
Posts: 2,802 | Thanked: 4,491 times | Joined on Nov 2007
#26
Originally Posted by gerbick View Post
Which part of what you said stands?
Which part doesn't?

Timeline:
  • elections open
  • Texrat drops out
  • elections close
  • results are announced and this thread is started
  • I point out that we don't have a board yet
  • you jump in with rants about selfish people that rewarded themselves, line their own pockets etc
  • Texrat reconsiders
  • I say I'm glad he did

Is anything above factually incorrect? Which part(s) do you have a problem with? I'm confused...

At the end of the day, it doesn't really matter. No contingencies, no repositories, no database being transitioned, no garage... nothing is ready to be handed off in a scant 2 months at this very moment.
AIUI (from meeting minutes etc) the council is in talks with Nokia re: handover but everything stalled as there was no legal entity to deal with. This is now finally resolved, and that is why I despaired at the prospect of a new election.

A lot of ground has to be covered and people are wholly unwilling to help.
FYI, I have already volunteered to help run the repositories.
 

The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to lma For This Useful Post: