View Single Post
pichlo's Avatar
Posts: 6,445 | Thanked: 20,981 times | Joined on Sep 2012 @ UK
#13
Originally Posted by sulu View Post
Openstreetmap ... see a problem in the character of their data. Usually when you need to evade copyright problems with competitors you make your product sufficiently different from theirs. But because their product is "the reality" as they put it, they don't see this as an option. A street in Openstreetmap will always essentially look the same as in the product of any commercial competitor, because there is only one way of displaying it correctly (direction, length, curvature, etc.).
That sounds like a diversion technique to me. Yes, OSM's problem is in the character of their data. But not because it reflects the reality. The main problem is how their data is collected. The number of volunteers walking round with handheld GPS receivers and laboriously taking down the data and drawing them on the map by hand is negligible. OSM's data is an amalgam of those and other sources, including digitizing paper maps which are copyrighted. This is the source of their headache. It might be difficult, if not impossible, to distinguish which part of the OSM's map was collected in which way, unless it is somehow tagged. They may get away with it for a while but over time they may end up being asked to provide the proof of the source.

I think the copyright holders will create hashes of their IP (or parts thereof), upload these hashes to some central DB, and whenever someone else uploads new content somewhere, the upload service will hash that new content and compare it to the already existing DB.
That will have to be a very clever hash, then, to avoid being fooled by slight modifications.
__________________
Русский военный корабль, иди нахуй!
 

The Following 5 Users Say Thank You to pichlo For This Useful Post: