View Single Post
GeneralAntilles's Avatar
Posts: 5,478 | Thanked: 5,222 times | Joined on Jan 2006 @ St. Petersburg, FL
#214
Originally Posted by Karel Jansens View Post
I know, it's a different processor and a different architecture, but this at least proves that the holdback for the drivers is not TI, as we were at one time led to believe by some.
It's proves nothing of the sort. What it proves is that TI negotiated a different arrangement for the drivers for the OMAP3's SGX with ImagTech than for the OMAP2's MBX.

Other than being unwilling to pay for substandard drivers (the Linux drivers for the MBX in their current state are, apparently, not fit for consumption), or to invest the time and money into improving them, Nokia is definitely not the holdup here.
__________________
Ryan Abel
 

The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to GeneralAntilles For This Useful Post: