Thread: Qt "stuck" at v5.6 in SFOS
View Single Post
javispedro's Avatar
javispedro is offline javispedro
2021-03-24 , 22:15
Posts: 2,355 | Thanked: 5,249 times | Joined on Jan 2009 @ Barcelona
#34
Originally Posted by olf View Post
No, it was a single paragraph of the preamble, plus pointing to the relevant terms (#2, #3 and #6) implementing the statement from that paragraph.
Yes, aka 25% of the total number of words in the license. Totally not blanket-quoting.

Originally Posted by olf View Post
Yes, these do fully "satisfy my point of view", if one reads them.
Specifically the quoted paragraph in the preamble clearly and abstractly depicts the goals of the GPLv3, which make its use problematic for quite some use cases (as discussed).
No, not "as discussed". You claimed that if a museum lends you a tablet with GPLv3 software it is "problematic". I disagree and the GPL FAQ disagrees.
Please don't bring in every other usecase in the world here.
 

The Following User Says Thank You to javispedro For This Useful Post: