Thread: How is btrfs meant to be used?
View Single Post
juiceme is offline juiceme
2015-07-14 , 08:30
Community Council | Posts: 4,920 | Thanked: 12,867 times | Joined on May 2012 @ Southerrn Finland
#6
Originally Posted by nieldk View Post
Thats how it 'should' work. Not always perfect though :P
BTRFS was a stupid choice, and gives more troubles than it solves problems.
Actually BTRFS was a good choise and made sense when it was decided to be used. (and still does) BTRFS has good feature set that is used and needed on the device and is optimized to minimize FLASH wear.

The real problem is users cramming too much data on the device, so the more sensible choise would have been having the device with 64GB storage in the first place...

Originally Posted by nieldk View Post
Unfortunately, it is as hard to ditch as the (in)famous Aegis
Totally different thing, Aegis was meant to be a barrier for users, whereas Jolla choise of FS is a blessing for you
 

The Following 5 Users Say Thank You to juiceme For This Useful Post: