View Single Post
Moderator | Posts: 5,320 | Thanked: 4,464 times | Joined on Oct 2009
#6435
Originally Posted by Bernard View Post
I think it probably was because they couldn't guarantee compatibility of certain applications, and didn't want to provide end-user support (too much costs/hassle). So they tried to sell it as a compatibility wrapper for developers. That way they only needed to provide support to the developer, not all users and sell the software for each application that runs correctly.
What they've said publicly before, seems to indicate that's kinda the way they'd prefer.
Hard to know for sure though... they were always pretty vague...
Going that way would require solid backing from Nokia I imagine.

Originally Posted by Bernard View Post
So I don't think it is a rights issue. The software effectively is just a Dalvik virtual machine for Maemo. That is all open source tech, and is available on all Android devices (even the non-google ones).
Ubuntu also once had a tech demo with Android widgets, and if you run Android x86 in a virtual machine, you have someting a bit similar.
But I think Dan's point is that Oracle has a case* in relation to Google's implementation of DVM.
Could this not also apply to Myriad's implementation...

*maybe ultimately a defeated one, but a case nonetheless.

Last edited by jalyst; 2011-09-20 at 16:41.
 

The Following User Says Thank You to jalyst For This Useful Post: