Off-topic...
Instead putting it onto the mods, why don't you/colleagues put relevant content into a locked gdoc.
|
Re: Neo900 - finally a successor of N900
Quote:
pretty please. Somewhat on topic: The N900's GPS can be annoyingly slow getting a fix, even with A-GPS. Does anyone have any experience with the suggested replacement? |
Re: Neo900 - finally a successor of N900
Quote:
|
Re: Neo900 - finally a successor of N900
Quote:
i hope you are not going to consider it an insult that i explain what & how i "don't understand"?
Quote:
thus, my point, reformulated:
Quote:
no offence intended! 'nuff said and no, i'm not going to bother starting my own "N900 hardware upgrade" project. i'll keep using my N900 with Thumb2... thus if that's all you have to answer, pls don't bother :| PS: the moment i find your ṔayPal account i'll send over some money :o :) obviously, without your dedication i wouldn't have been able to set up Thumb2 & all thanks for that! |
Re: Neo900 - finally a successor of N900
Quote:
that's not a market. not even a niche. that's a community well, two, joining forces as Joerg put it so nicely period do you have a N9? if it wasn't for the lack of hardware keyboard, i would have switched about a year ago. and it's not like i haven't tried both a Logitech di Novo & some OEM bluetooth keyboard; doesn't work :mad: and i think Jolla is going to give us a great N9 upgrade, software and hardware wise. but to each his / her own, right? why am i posting on this thread then? trolling, flaming? of course! what else would one come to TMO for???? ¦-)))))) beside, i haven't seen Jolla's hardware keyboard other half yet, thus, keeping all my options open |
Re: Neo900 - finally a successor of N900
Quote:
|
Re: Neo900 - finally a successor of N900
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
seems i'm not the only one having a problem with your semantics |
Re: Neo900 - finally a successor of N900
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
nope Google [libhybris jolla]... o, no, sorry, you don't use Google, do you? |
Re: Neo900 - finally a successor of N900
Quote:
|
Re: Neo900 - finally a successor of N900
Quote:
it's a meritocracy ¦-))))))))) you have to vote! geeee, where is our Gorbatchov?!? |
Re: Neo900 - finally a successor of N900
Quote:
|
Re: Neo900 - finally a successor of N900
Quote:
your are blaming the symptom, not the cause my friend. |
Re: Neo900 - finally a successor of N900
misterc,
you seem to have a very strong opnion but my undestanding is joerg is _THE_ person organising this project, and as he stated eary in this thread it will not be a "democratic" process you are free to post suggestions and he is free to decline them please respect his decisions as they are his to make thank you, chainsawbike |
Re: Neo900 - finally a successor of N900
Quote:
|
Re: Neo900 - finally a successor of N900
Quote:
i'll add yet another one (sorry, stopped counting...) Quote:
|
Re: Neo900 - finally a successor of N900
Quote:
Quote:
They've made many statements of intent on "roughly" how open they'd like it to be, but statements of intent are just that, statements of intent. Quote:
There's been some speculation that libhybris may be used to some extent for a dalvik emulation layer, but so far it's no more than that. You are confusing hw compatibility layers with dalvik emulation layers... Again, libhybris was originally intended for glibc <-> bionic-c translation for binary blobs & similar level sw, nothing more & nothing less. And what is wrong with you man, why must you "scatter gun" threads like this all the time. If you really must redundantly address every single post, at least merge them all into one post, basic etiquette. Anyway all this is completely off-topic, so any further responses just PM me... |
Re: Neo900 - finally a successor of N900
Quote:
|
Re: Off-topic...
Quote:
Heck, it is hugely overpowered for a Pentium® based box to start with. (Replied here so as not to increase the noise level in the other thread even more.) |
All times are GMT. The time now is 07:02. |
vBulletin® Version 3.8.8